Did George W. Bush protect those who attacked us on 9-11? Why?

“It’s classified because if it were released, the people would demand war against Saudi Arabia, and the entire US policy of having the Sunni Arabs price their oil in US dollars in exchange for supporting their dictatorships would fall apart.”
— Comment left at Hot Air

Buried among the headlines at the Drudge Report this morning is this bombshell:

Inside the Saudi 911 Coverup by Paul Sperry, author of “Infilftration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives have penetrated Washington“.  (I interviewed Sperry about his book when it came out in 2005.)

http://nypost.com/2013/12/15/inside-the-saudi-911-coverup/

Inline image 3

More about this on the Washington Times Communities page:  The Bush Legacy: Protecting Those Behind 9-11

http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/judson-phillips-cold-hard-truth/2013/dec/15/bush-legacy-protecting-those-behind-911/

Inline image 1

Hot Air is reporting:  Two Congressmen claim secret report on 9-11 pins the blame on Saudi Arabia

http://hotair.com/archives/2013/12/16/two-congressmen-claim-secret-report-on-911-pins-the-blame-on-saudi-arabia/

Inline image 4

Debra Burlingame, sister of Chic Burlingame, who died while piloting American Airlines Flight 77 that crashed into the Pentagon when it was commandeered by Saudi hijackers, is a member of the 9/11 family steering committee trying to get those pages declassified.

Inline image 5

6,750 U.S. service members have died in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom — fighting a war against who?  The Saudis???   No.

Tonight we’ll take a look at this bombshell revelation on my radio show — 9pm ET.  
http://BlogTalkRadio.com/ASKShow

Meanwhile, here’s what YOU can do.  Contact YOUR congressman (they’re now in their home districts for Christmas break) and demand he/she insist that this report bedeclassified. If what is alleged by Paul Sperry in the New York Post report is true, Congress needs to start asking George W. Bush some serious questions.

By Radiopatriot

Former Talk Radio Host, TV reporter/anchor, Aerospace Public Relations Mgr, Newspaper Columnist, Political Activist Twitter.com/RadioPatriot * Telegram/Radiopatriot * Telegram/Andrea Shea King Gettr/radiopatriot * TRUTHsocial/Radiopatriot

9 comments

  1. A new book on 9/11 is out. The author knew the Mossad agent who organised the events of that day.

    Dimitri Khalezov has spent 10 years researching and writing this book. Download links:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0pdmokX9s8

    Or read at:
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/170266922/9-11thology-The-third-truth-about-9-11-or-Defending-the-US-Government-which-has-only-the-first-two

    In a 2010 interview, Khalezov explained that you can’t build a skyscraper in NYC without an approved demolition plan. On 9/11, the World Trade Center’s demolition plan was put into action to demolish the complex.

    Khalezov learned of this demolition plan from his job in the Soviet Union. He had worked in the nuclear intelligence unit and under an agreement between the Soviet Union and the USA, each country was obliged to inform the other of peaceful uses of nuclear explosions. The WTC was built with 3 thermo-nuclear charges in its foundations.

    Note: underground nuclear explosions do not produce mushroom clouds. This is only ever seen when the explosion takes place above ground. On 9/11, the explosions were deep underground.

    More info:
    http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_154.htm

    You can watch the 2010 interview at:
    http://www.disclose.tv/forum/dimitri-khalezov-wtc-nuclear-demolition-full-playlist-t21675.html
    Video # 4 – WTC’s demolition plan
    Video # 14 – WTC 7 (which fell ½ hour AFTER the BBC announced its collapse).
    Videos # 24/25 – chronic radiation sickness of WTC responders (their cancers are not due to asbestos poisoning)

    Khalezov was interviewed on 4 Sept 2013:
    http://www.renseradioarchives.com/harris/

    Here is a recent article mentioning Khalezov:
    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/12/28/mossad-bush-planned-executed-911/

    I know it is preposterous to claim that the WTC was brought down by nukes. But note that the place where the WTC once stood is called ‘Ground Zero’. If you look up the meaning of ‘ground zero’ in the old dictionaries you have at home, you’ll find that there would only be one definition. It is what you call a place that has been nuked.

    After 9/11, the US government sent people out to switch all the dictionaries in the public domain. The replacements differed only in the meaning of ‘ground zero’. They show extra definitions for that term, to obfuscate the original single meaning.

    For example, if you have a genuine old Merriam-Webster dictionary, you would see this:
    ground zero n (1946) : the point directly above, below, or at which a nuclear explosion occurs.

    The replacement books (even of old editions) show two extra definitions and this is what you’ll see:
    ground zero n (1946) 1 : the point directly above, below, or at which a nuclear explosion occurs. 2: the center or origin of rapid, intense, or violent activity or change 3: the very beginning : SQUARE ONE

    Have a look at this video:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBQuoPi_grw
    At 6:05 mins, he shows the old and new definitions of ‘ground zero’.

  2. Just started reading this great book by Dr Judy Wood, “Where did the Towers Go”?…..she pretty much nailed it, she also produced an amazing and scary video on the subject…more than similar to what happened in Maui…..maybe this will be addressed more seriously now….the Bushes are neck deep in it of course and are demons…..

Leave a Reply to radiopatriot20commentatorCancel reply

Discover more from The Radio Patriot

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading