The Senate Impeachment trial is on. Now we watch.
How do you introduce evidence legally?
Did ‘Impeachment’ provide a platform to discuss findings of Ukraine?
How do you introduce evidence legally?
Did ‘Impeachment’ harm or help POTUS [public]?
How do you introduce [D]s high crimes [corruption] to the public?
Why didn’t POTUS remove [Hussein] holdovers from NSC?
Do you really believe that POTUS & team trusted [Hussein] holdovers to remain within the admin and work to enact POTUS’ agenda w/o bias or confrontation?
How do you ‘awaken’ the ‘induced coma’ public [FAKE NEWS control] from their long sleep?
Sometimes allowing your enemies to [openly] attack…….
Logical thinking.
Q
“Answer: by using it in defense of a charge against yourself that THEY brought up????
These stupid politicians are setting the table for their own demise, and ITS ALL GOING TO BE ON CONGRESSIONAL RECORD. “Hunters become the HUNTED.”” — We The Media at TELEGRAM
There’s that WWII poster right? About loose lips? And the other one? About a Big cup of Shut the F Up. But we’re not really in that kind of war. This is a war of intrigue and intelligence, planned decades ago. Slapping a plan together to surprise the enemy should be a snap.
Pingback: So now the evidence can and will be brought out. – Beacon of Hope