Pfizer Whistleblower says…

Pfizer whistleblower Karen Kingston:

‘When I find the patents I was very alarmed because they didn’t read as a vaccine. They read as a bioweapon.”

By Radiopatriot

Former Talk Radio Host, TV reporter/anchor, Aerospace Public Relations Mgr, Newspaper Columnist, Political Activist Twitter.com/RadioPatriot * Telegram/Radiopatriot * Telegram/Andrea Shea King Gettr/radiopatriot * TRUTHsocial/Radiopatriot

7 comments

  1. Karen Kingston is a pharmaceutical and medical device business analyst. She started out in sales. She has never been on the research or development side of pharmaceuticals. She is no expert, and therefore suspect. While she is correct that the patent information is more akin to a biowarfare compound, she neglects to include in her analysis that this is a completely different anti-viral than anything we have ever administered to the general public.r It is wholly synthetic. To place her on a “pedestal” here is just more mis-information mongering. It is akin to having an RN try to explain the evils of the vaccine. RN’s do not have the education, training, and experience in the formulation (or testing methods) of ANY vaccines.

    1. Thank you for the info, esomer329. We are all searching for the truth and the sad part is, physicians and virologists are not agreeing on what that truth is. Also, I’m curious – do you have a background in immunology and epidimiology? Thanks!

      1. Spot on, Radiopatriot. We are ALL responsible for researching the truth for ourselves–NOT the “government”.

  2. As an RN BSN with 25+ yrs experience I take offense to the above comment that an RN does not have the “education, training or experience” to make the judgement a vaccine could be ‘evil’ or unsafe. Our judgement could be from reading research (yes we do that in nursing school and beyond!) and/or from witnessing severe reactions and anecdotal evidence. As an RN, I certainly question the safety and efficacy of this experimental injection and certainly wonder if there could be malfeasance in its planning and distribution. Additionally, I would not feel comfortable administering it to anyone.

    1. Bravo and thank you for writing. Both my daughter (head of epidemiology and RN working on her Masters) and my two RN granddaughters agree that this is not a vaccine and is dangerous. I know there are differences of opinion among medical professionals, but my experience is that those who reside in blue states/communities tend to think the “vax” should be mandated, while a large percentage of those residing in red states are against both the jab, the mask, and the overbearing totalitarian bureaucrats who populate our government and agencies at the local, state, and national level.

      I don’t blame you for feeling offended at what another reader wrote. I am offended with you.

      1. Interesting that those “overbearing totalitarian bureaucrats” are all about supporting “my body, my choice” when it comes to killing babies, but not when it comes to keeping alive our national economy — and likely our eternal souls. (I am convinced that the “vaccine” is the Mark of the Beast that is predicted in the Holy Bible. And, if it is not the Mark, then it is a precursor that breaks down a person’s ability to resist the Mark later. There are plenty of stories of people that “could no longer feel God” after they got the jab. Couple that with totalitarian vaccine passports — without which “no man may buy or sell”, just as was predicted about the Mark.)

Leave a Reply to RadiopatriotCancel reply

Discover more from The Radio Patriot

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading