By Radiopatriot
Former Talk Radio Host,
TV reporter/anchor,
Aerospace Public Relations Mgr,
Newspaper Columnist,
Political Activist
Twitter.com/RadioPatriot * Telegram/Radiopatriot * Telegram/Andrea Shea King
Gettr/radiopatriot * TRUTHsocial/Radiopatriot
View all of Radiopatriot's posts.
The editor list is fascinating.
Wikipedia:
In 2015, the magazine published an editorial entitled “Against Trump,” calling him a “philosophically unmoored political opportunist” and announcing its opposition to his candidacy for the Republican nomination for president.[29] Since Trump’s election to the presidency, the National Review editorial board has continued to criticize him.[30][31][32]
However, contributors to National Review and National Review Online take a variety of positions on Trump. Lowry and Hanson support him,[33] while National Review contributors such as Ramesh Ponnuru and Jonah Goldberg have remained critical of Trump.[34] In a Washington Post feature on conservative magazines, T.A. Frank noted: “From the perspective of a reader, these tensions make National Review as lively as it has been in a long time.”[35]
“The Buckley Rule”. In a 1967 interview, in which he was asked about the choice of presidential candidate, Buckley said, “The wisest choice would be the one who would win… I’d be for the most right, viable candidate who could win.”
So National Review violates The Buckley Rule because Trump won twice, and will be in office for a third time.
So why read National Review… to let the so called conservative anti-MAGA out themselves.
Well done!