Why did Q tell us in Post #916: “We are saving ISRAEL for last. Very specific reason not mentioned a single time.” Q
GROK’s response:
Q Post #916, dated March 10, 2018, on the 8chan /qresearch/ board, reads in full: “We are saving Israel for last. Very specific reason not mentioned a single time. Q” This was in response to an anonymous user asking if Israel was involved in various conspiracies mentioned in prior posts, such as those involving the Awan family (related to alleged Pakistani IT scandals in Congress).
The “why” behind this statement has never been explicitly explained by Q (the anonymous poster behind QAnon drops), as the post itself emphasizes that the “very specific reason” is deliberately “not mentioned a single time.”
QAnon drops are inherently cryptic and designed to encourage followers to “research” and interpret them, often leading to a wide range of speculative theories. Q ceased posting in December 2020, leaving many such phrases unresolved.
Based on analyses from QAnon communities, archives, and critical examinations, here are the most common interpretations of what Q might have meant, drawn from discussions among believers and observers:
Primary Interpretations from QAnon Followers
- Israel as the “Final Boss” of the Deep State Conspiracy: Many QAnon adherents believe the phrase indicates that Israel (or powerful Zionist elements within it, such as Mossad intelligence or influential lobbying groups like AIPAC) represents the ultimate core of a global “cabal” or “deep state” controlling world events. According to this view, lower-level exposures—like political scandals, human trafficking networks (e.g., Epstein’s island), or financial corruption in places like the Vatican, Saudi Arabia, or China—must happen first to build public awareness and prevent premature backlash. Revealing Israel’s alleged role too early could trigger defenses like media smears of “anti-Semitism,” false-flag attacks, or even nuclear threats via the “Samson Option” (Israel’s purported doomsday nuclear policy). This sequencing is seen as strategic to ensure the “plan” succeeds without collapsing under unified elite resistance. (PrayingMedic.com)
- Ties to Mossad, Blackmail, and Surveillance Operations: Some theories link it to alleged Israeli intelligence operations, such as the PROMIS software scandal (stolen U.S. tech reportedly used for global spying), or Jeffrey Epstein’s network as a Mossad “honeypot” for blackmailing U.S. elites into pro-Israel policies. Robert Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell’s father) is often cited as a Mossad agent who facilitated such schemes. “Saving Israel for last” purportedly means dismantling these peripheral ops (e.g., exposing Epstein connections) before targeting the source in Tel Aviv, to avoid alerting the “king” too soon in the “chess game” of global takedowns.
- Contract or Corporate Expiration Theory: A niche but persistent idea claims Israel was established as a “corporation” in 1948 via Rothschild banking, with a supposed 75-year “contract” expiring around October 2023 (tied to solar eclipses or other esoteric events). Once expired, it allegedly reverts to non-sovereign status, allowing “white hats” (pro-Trump military/intel forces) to intervene without violating international law, similar to how Washington D.C. was supposedly “fenced off” as a bankrupt entity. This interprets “last” as timed to coincide with legal dissolution, enabling full exposure of crimes like human trafficking. (@Prolotario1)
- Biblical or Esoteric Angles: Certain fringe interpretations frame modern Israel as the “Synagogue of Satan” from the Book of Revelation, distinct from biblical Israel, and controlled by “Khazarian Mafia” (a pseudo-historical claim about Ashkenazi Jews descending from Khazars rather than ancient Israelites). The “specific reason” is left unmentioned to avoid early accusations of racism, but implies a spiritual “awakening” where Israel’s corruption is revealed as part of an apocalyptic battle. (Rumble.com)
Critical Perspectives and Broader Context
Outside QAnon circles, this post is often viewed as a nod to longstanding anti-Semitic tropes, such as blood libel (accusations of ritual murder) or Jewish global control conspiracies, repackaged for modern audiences. (NewRepublic.com)
Critics argue it’s a deliberate ambiguity that allows Q to appeal to far-right elements prone to such theories without outright stating them, effectively “saving” the topic to maintain plausible deniability. (@badrudiin23)
QAnon as a whole has been debunked by fact-checkers, with no major predictions (like mass arrests or “the storm”) coming true, and it’s been linked to real-world violence, such as the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot.
In pro-Israel QAnon subsets, the phrase is sometimes reframed positively—as protecting Israel from internal “deep state” infiltrators or ensuring its security amid global cleanups.
However, the dominant narrative among core believers leans toward viewing Israel (or its leadership) as antagonistic.Ultimately, since Q never elaborated, any “why” remains speculative and reflects the interpreter’s biases.
If you’re referring to a specific theory or context, more details could help narrow it down.
-GROK
