Heartbreaking, Part II

. . . . .

UPDATED

Cards and letters, but no packages, can be sent to Lakin at the following address, and should not mention rank: Terrence Lakin #89996, 830 Sabalu Road, Fort Leavenworth, KS 66027.

Please help LTC Terry Lakin’s family by making a monetary donation to a Trust set up for his family. Go here today and give what you can. He gave all! http://www.TerryLakinActionFund.com

Tonight THURSDAY 12/30 on The ANDREA SHEA KING SHOW

Cmdr. Charles Kerchner (USNRet) was there.  He told what happened in the courtroom where 18-year service member U.S. Army physician LTC. Terry Lakin was hung out to dry for defending his oath to protect the Constitution of these United States.

The ANDREA SHEA KING Show

9pm ET

Blog Talk Radio

CDR Charles Kerchner speaks out – the Court-Martial of Lt. Col. Terry Lakin

“HIS OWN DEFENSE ATTORNEY BROKE HIM”

by Sharon Rondeau

Excerpts from a PosteMail interview with Cmdr. Charles Kerchner, USNRet

Terry had been questioning Obama’s eligibility for over two years, and not only did he go to his elected representatives; he used a formal path available to soldiers, filling out a form or writing a letter, to request a congressional inquiry.  If a soldier is having some issue with the military chain of command or for any reason feels that he has been unjustly treated, there is the Article 138 where you can directly ask your senior chain of command about it.  He also filed another form or letter to request a congressional inquiry; he requested more than once that an investigation be done about Obama’s eligibility because as an officer, he had sworn an oath to the U.S. Constitution.  He had great doubts that Obama was eligible, and he wanted them to investigate, and they didn’t even answer him.

…

The Constitution is not a piece of parchment paper down there on display in Washington.  It is the fundamental law of the land. The lawfulness of all orders issued by officers and the people above them shall be judged by that law, because his officer’s oath is to do just that, to support and defend the Constitution.

So they should not have court-martialed him for this; they should have held a congressional inquiry and answered the question.  If I had been the lawyer defending Terry, that’s the approach I would have taken.  The Constitution is the fundamental law of the land, and all orders from all officers shall be judged against that, and if the officer is charged with disobeying the order, there should be a congressional inquiry to see if that order was lawful, because it’s a question of fundamental constitutional law and lawfulness.”

. . . . .