Atlas Shrugs.

I love huh…

Pamela Geller at Atlas Shrugs minces no words tonight when it comes to calling out the effete fairies who pose as “conservatives” in the inside-the-beltway media circle jerk who are strewing turd daisies on the path to destruction.  Hold on to your hat, batten down the hatches, and bring your children close to your breast.  The storm is coming.  Fast.

Watch for our article on Bill Kristol, Rich Lowry and Joe Klein coming out on BIG Peace, any moment now…

***

Bill Kristol has opened the french doors of his ivory tower, stepped out and deigned to address the great unwashed conservative quarter. High above the people and reality, he admonishes those on the right for not embracing the catastrophic events unfolding in the Middle East.

In his opinion piece, Stand for Freedom, he dismisses or summarily denies the concrete facts on the ground. Of course, we all want freedom. Of course, we support voices yearning to be free. We fought for and believed The Bush Doctrine, and still do. But there is far more at work here, as evidenced by the fierce behind-the-scenes jockeying and arm-twisting by the on-the-ascent Muslim Brotherhood, an organization created after the fall of the Ottoman Empire.

The left wing lemmings are eating up this discourse among us like maggots on dead flesh, but that is their only joy, so let them have it.

But Kristol is so wrong, inexcusably so. Glenn Beck nailed it. The advance of Islamic supremacism is exactly what is at play here. And we are right to be cautious. Nobody expects Mubarak to survive — we only care about what comes after. There is Kristol-lite and there is reality.

Muslim Brotherhood: Egyptians demanding restoration of Islamic law

And yet William Kristol writes:

The United States has played a role in helping those transitions turn out (reasonably) well. America needn’t be passive or fretful or defensive. We can help foster one outcome over another. As Krauthammer puts it, “Elections will be held. The primary U.S. objective is to guide a transition period that gives secular democrats a chance.”

Now, people are more than entitled to their own opinions of how best to accomplish that democratic end. And it’s a sign of health that a political and intellectual movement does not respond to a complicated set of developments with one voice.

But hysteria is not a sign of health. When Glenn Beck rants about the caliphate taking over the Middle East from Morocco to the Philippines, and lists (invents?) the connections between caliphate-promoters and the American left, he brings to mind no one so much as Robert Welch and the John Birch Society. He’s marginalizing himself, just as his predecessors did back in the early 1960s.

Nor is it a sign of health when other American conservatives are so fearful of a popular awakening that they side with the dictator against the democrats. Rather, it’s a sign of fearfulness unworthy of Americans, of short-sightedness uncharacteristic of conservatives, of excuse-making for thuggery unworthy of the American conservative tradition.

We welcome freedom. We are not siding with dictators, but fighting against the tyranny of Islamic totalitarianism, and so should you, Mr. Kristol. Shame on you.

We are not naive. We saw these same Western liberals usher in the reign of the Ayatollah Khomeini and that, too, changed the world forever, for the worse. Much worse.

It was not so long ago, after all, when conservatives understood that Middle Eastern dictatorships such as Mubarak’s help spawn global terrorism. We needn’t remind our readers that the most famous of the 9/11 hijackers, Mohammed Atta, was an Egyptian, as is al Qaeda’s number two, Ayman al Zawahiri.

Indeed. Islam produces jihad, Mr. Kristol. Islam produces fundamentalism. The quran commands it, demands it. Millions of jihadis are reading the same playbook. Blaming Mubarak or US policy for jihad is like blaming a woman for being raped (ah, if only she didn’t have that vagina, all would be well).

The idea that democracy produces radical Islam is false: Whether in Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, the Palestinian territories, or Egypt, it is the dictatorships that have promoted and abetted Islamic radicalism. (Hamas, lest we forget, established its tyranny in Gaza through nondemocratic means.)

Is that so? So please, Mr. Islamic scholar Kristol, explain all of the jihadists and home grown terrorists born and raised in Western nations. Think, man. Quoting Robert Spencer, “Muslims are the first immigrant group that has ever come to this country with a ready-made model of society and government they believe to be superior to what we have here.”

What irks me is that Kristol is dead wrong on Beck’s presentation. Finally, someone had the gonads to speak to Islamic supremacism and its global project nine years after Setoemebr 1tth,  and Kristol has the gall to smack him down. How the Weekly Standard has failed the right!  Mnay of us have been covering this for years, perplexed and disturbed that no one in the mainstream media dare touch it.

The left always aligns itself with the totalitarian ideology of the day (ie Stalinism, communism, national socialism [nazism]), and so it is with Islamic supremacism. Those of us covering the anti-America, anti-war, anti -Israel movement have documented this for years. CODE PINK, ANSWER, Al Awda,Socialist Workers Party, International Solidarity Movement (ISM), CAIR, ISNA, If Americans Knew (IAK), Friends of Sabeel-North America (FOSNA), Muslim American Society (MAS), Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) have bee working and agitating together for years.

Trust me, Mr. Kristol, Beck did not “invent” that.

There is nothing that Beck said was inaccurate. It’s all there. You don’t have to look for ghosts. There is vast historical, political, judicial evidence of the global jihad and its ties. As for the existence of the violent goals of the caliphate, read the quran and hadith. Tally the daily death toll of non-Muslims in Muslim countries aroung the world.  Or better yet,  take a quick look at the past millennium and the 270 million victims of jihadi wars, land appropriations, cultural annihilations and enslavements.

An American conservatism that looks back to 1776 cannot turn its back on the Egyptian people. We should wish them well—and we should work to help them achieve as good an outcome as possible.

This prig is lecturing us on 1776? We live it. Every day. I have for the past nine years since 911. I strongly recommend Mr. Kristol step back and read Ibn Warraq, Wafa Sultan, Sir Martin Gilbert, Mark Durie, Jewish history, the Muslim Brotherhood project, the news accounts of the jihad in Thailand, Somalia, the Philippines, Ethiopia, China, Beslan, Moscow, London, Madrid, Israel, Lebanon, Sudan, Tunisia, Kenya ……. you get the picture.

[ Read the rest here ]