. . . . .
Jack Cashill is writing up a storm — of controversy, that is. In the space of three days he has written as many articles, appearing at American Thinker and WorldNetDaily.
Why? Because of continuing and growing controversy about the circumstances of Obama’s nativity, his schooling, his associations, his social security numbers, and a whole slew of other unknowns about this Manchurian president.
Jack’s latest piece addresses the hapless Mike Huckabee, a man who evidently has never missed a lunch or the opportunity to keep his mouth open when it should be shut.
Lying in wait for Huckabee, an eager volunteer in the campaign for the White House, was that savvy veteran of the Clinton “War Room,” George Stephanopoulos.
Huffed Stephanopoulos, “It seems like Republican leaders have the hardest time in the world saying simply and clearly, ‘President Obama is a Christian and a citizen, get over it.'”
After dancing around the trap for a minute, Huckabee yielded to Stephanopoulos’s prodding and fell in.
“I just don’t think it’s completely necessary for us to delve into such extraneous matters,” sniffed Huckabee. “And for Republicans to even be bringing it up, I think it’s a waste of energy and time.”
Mission accomplished. In one cagey maneuver, Stephanopoulos was able to make every other Republican but Huckabee look foolish – at least in the eyes of his mindless audience – and to make Huckabee look foolish in the eyes of those who know something about Obama.
Jack schools Huckabee and every other political talking head out there desperately trying to not get dropped into the Left’s dunk tank:
The first Republican candidate to educate himself on this issue, and to turn the tables on his tormentors, will likely be the next president of the United States. Here is what he says.
“George, I cannot tell anyone to ‘get over it’ on the question of Obama’s citizenship or on his religion until we know more about both.
“Obama himself once told us, George, ‘The only people who don’t want to disclose the truth are those with something to hide.’
“So why are you asking me or Sarah or John about his citizenship? Why not ask Obama? If he has nothing to hide he will disclose the truth, and the matter will be settled.
“To be honest, I do not know where Obama was born, but I do know the story of his origins that he told us in ‘Dreams from My Father’ and repeated over and over again during the campaign is inarguably false.
“Do you know where Obama grew up, George? Tell us. Yes, Hawaii, yes, Indonesia. But you do not seem to know that he spent the first year of his life in thestate of Washingtonwith his mother while Obama Sr. remained behind in Hawaii.
“When his mom and he returned to Hawaii a year later, Obama Sr. had already lammed out of there. As late as 2009, Obama was telling America’s schoolchildren that his father left home when he was 2. That was a lie.
“Why is this important, George? Here is why. Obama based his campaign for the presidency on his nativity story, one that he knew to be false.
“‘My parents shared not only an improbable love,’ Obama told the nation during his breakthrough 2004 convention speech. ‘They shared an abiding faith in the possibilities of this nation.’ In reality, George, they shared no such thing. They never lived together.
“Obama continued, ‘They imagined me going to the best schools in the land, even though they weren’t rich, because in a generous America you don’t have to be rich to achieve your potential.’ More nonsense. There was no ‘they’ to do any imagining.
“George, no presidential candidate in history has been able to move through a campaign with less scrutiny. And that fault, my friend, is yours.
“Sure, I’d like to see his birth certificate, but I’d be happy to learn his SAT scores or to find out why he has a Connecticut Social Security number.
“As to his religion, we know Obama enrolled in a Muslim school in a Muslim land under the guidance of his Muslim stepfather. That does not make him a Muslim, but that does not make him a Christian either.
“He tells us that the Reverend Jeremiah Wright introduced him to Christianity. Well, Obama can call Wright a Christian all he wants, but a man who asks God to damn America is anything but Christ-like.
“George, there is suspicion abroad in the land because you and your colleagues failed miserably to do your job. Republicans don’t owe Obama an apology. You owe us one.
“And George, remember when Obama told those Virginia schoolteachers he wrote his own books? Well, he was lying about that too.”
Love that Jack! Read the rest here. “The left’s character assassins sharpen knives” is here.
The Thinker piece is here, complete with the word “dipsomaniacal”. Look it up.
. . . . .
obama is a puppet who’s strings are being pulled by george soros. soros is an avowed Marxist/Communist and is making every effort to run the World. Being a Jew, he will be murdered along with the Christians, Hindus and every other religious belief in the World that is not muslim, if the muslims gain control. Poor george, poor barak, the muslim extremists don’t care.
Despite some amiable qualities and a fair degree of intelligence, at his core Huckabee is yet another stooge for the Council on Foreign Relations — just like his buddies Fred Thompson and Dr. Richard Land.
Don’t believe me? Click here.
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55776
Yep, gotta love that Jack.
Mike is Obama’s ‘Huckle-Barry’
ignorance is no excuse, but in Mike’s case it’s bliss.
This is an excellent piece, as is everything Cashill writes.
There is one thing, though, that I think bears mentioning. In making one important point, he virtually discards and denies another. He does it twice:
“‘My parents shared not only an improbable love,’ Obama told the nation during his breakthrough 2004 convention speech. ‘They shared an abiding faith in the possibilities of this nation.’ In reality, George, they shared no such thing. They never lived together.
Obama continued, ‘They imagined me going to the best schools in the land, even though they weren’t rich, because in a generous America you don’t have to be rich to achieve your potential.’ More nonsense. There was no ‘they’ to do any imagining.
The important points that virtually get discarded are that by “possibilities of this nation” we clearly understand that Obama meant the “faith” that this nation could be transformed into a socialist paradise. They (whoever “they” would consist of) most certainly DID share this “faith” and imparted it to him.
By “a generous America” in which “you don’t have to be rich to fulfill your potential” Obama clearly meant, again, a socialist paradise where everyone is equal in everything. It is certainly NOT nonsense that they “imagined” such an America, whether or not they did this as a “they” together, or it was some other “they,” someone did teach this to Obama and he learned that lesson all too well.
While I see the importance of exposing the real relationships in Obama’s early life, it is extremely important that the fact of his socialist ideology not be in any way diminished in that pursuit, even if only by accidental appearance.
One of the empowering things about Obama’s evil nature is his ability to say things that mean one thing to people on the Left while meaning the near-opposite to people on the right.
Thus, when a conservative reads about “the possibilities of this nation”, it means that intellect and dilligence can produce a fruitful life. But, to a liberal, it means that one can skim off the productivity of others.
To a conservative, “a generous America” means people that freely give from their hearts to help others. To a liberal, it means a nation of sheeple that put up with tax rates much higher than those that sparked revolutions in American in 1776 and in Hungary in 1956.
He is a master of double-speak, such that the ultimate “audacity of hope” is to have seized the White House without having fired a shot. (For the proper reaction to such a scenario, read the novel “The First Team”.)