. . . . .

Shepard Smith: “Fox News Can Confirm That The President Of The United States Is A Citizen Of the United States, Period”
Does it seem strange to you that all three cable news networks have come out on the same day absolutely disputing the so-called “birther” issue as a farce?
On Monday afternoon, Fox News’ Shepard Smith stated unequivocally that Fox News’ confirms the president’s place of birth is Hawaii. Period. And then he held up as proof the Certificate of Live Birth (COLB) that is not the same as a long form birth certificate which would include specifics such as hospital, doctor, etc. Shepard Smith would not have made that bold statement if he didn’t have the backing of the people behind the curtain, trust me on that.
Also on Monday, Anderson Cooper used the same COLB to declare that “a new CNN investigation reveals what most analysts have been saying since the so-called “birther” controversy erupted during the 2008 presidential campaign: Obama was born in the state of Hawaii on August 4, 1961. Period.”
MSNBC and its big brother NBC have maintained all along that those who want proof of Obama’s citizenship (a red herring if I’ve ever heard one, given that the issue is how father’s citizenship renders Obama NOT a natural born citizen under the definition of the Constitution) are loons, birthers, racists or worse.
It seems evident to me that the nets, who we know are controlled by mega-media-magnates with global interests, had a “come to Jesus” meeting over the Easter weekend. They are seeing that Obama’s mysterious past is gaining tremendous momentum among their viewers and they must tamp down and obliterate any and all discussion about Obama’s legitimacy, no matter what quarter it is coming from. They are in lockstep to ignore those with forensic proof or destroy the credibility and reputation of those they can’t shut up from loudly pointing to the Emperor Obama walking about naked.
The match struck by Donald Trump has set off a wildfire among Americans that the power elites are scrambling to douse. You see, it could be one of two things: they have a plan, and The Donald is screwing it up. He’s joining — and leading — the chorus of legions of Americans who have legitimate concerns about our president’s Constitutional legitimacy.
Or the FCC licensees have been warned by powers greater than themselves that any damage to Obama will rain hell on their license and ability to make obscene amounts of advertising revenue. And perhaps even invite IRS agents to comb through their personal tax filings. “Ve haf our vays…”
As if The Donald’s proclamations are not troubling enough for the globalist media conglomerates, this past Easter weekend the Rev. Franklin Graham publicly made his doubts known about Obama, sending the info-gatekeepers into stroke territory. Apoplectic, they’re now even more desperate to douse this fire — in a hurry. Watch what happens. Rev. Franklin Graham is a little more difficult to marginalize than The Donald. Perhaps they’ll just ignore him after this Easter eruption.
“But why?” you ask. Why have the media merged into a monolith to protect Obama? Why have they fallen into lockstep with each other to prevent the question from being asked, the issue of Obama’s eligibility from being investigated, the truth from being told?
Because of Trump (and now Rev. Graham), they have to “report” and “comment” on it. But notice how they assiduously avoid ever, ever venturing into the more important and relevant Constitutional question. They deliberately ignore the obvious — that Obama is already illegitimate as the son of a father not an American citizen. That it is suspected that Obama carried a passport NOT United States issued when he traveled to Pakistan as a young man. That he was adopted by an Indonesian, given his surname, and enrolled in an Indonesian school as a Muslim. And what of his Social Security number issued from Connecticut? Kept hidden are his academic records, and much more. We know as much about Obama as we do the Federal Reserve.
So… Does the media complex machine and its globalist partners have the gameboard set? Is their agent Obama already in place for the duration to facilitate America’s demise, to ensure that America’s greatness is over and we lose in this new world order game?
I am and have been suspicious of Fox News for some time — easily more than a year, closely watching how and what they report. And more importantly, what they don’t report. What they do not tell us. I am convinced that Murdoch, Ailes and Company are in on the game and they just want you to think they’re looking out for you. That they’re “Fair and Balanced” and the spin stops with them. It’s their brand. That’s all it is. And to the average viewer who might spend a couple of hours a day watching it, Fox’ message is being swallowed whole.
But the rest of us with time to read, research, watch, and discuss with other concerned citizens, are disturbed by what we see happening. It is fiendishly clever. And diabolically dangerous to our freedom.
What are they hiding from us? Why are they hiding the truth? I think I’ve answered my own question. It’s the Fox leading the sheep to slaughter.
. . . . .

Rupert Murdoch News International Admits Phone Hacking and Lies
(Curiously, from my RSS Feeds I cannot access the article, or any from Newsflavr after this article was posted 4/8/11. Neither has Newsflavor posted any subsequent articles. Hmmmm…)
From the Feed:
News of the World Journalists were Phone Hacking on a Regular Basis
After years of Civil Actions brought by celebrities (including actress Sienna Miller), police investigations and the prosecution of one fall guy and his sidekick (royal editor Clive Goodman and PI Glen Mulcaire) News International have apologised and are offering settlements to some of the people whose mobile (cell) phones some of their employees have hacked into. It seems that phone hacking was prevalent rather than a one-off activity as News International had insisted time and time again. With apologies being handed out it is safe to say that News International will admit it lied soon.
Image via Wikipedia | Rupert Murdoch
Rupert Murdoch CEO In Charge
News International’s CEO is Rupert Murdoch. The organisation are the owners of Britain’s biggest selling Sunday newspaper The News of the World. It was News of the World Journalists who were phone hacking regularly. This was discovered as celebrities, politicians and pundits started to realise that listening into their phone messages was the only way they could have got their scoops. News International also owns The Times and The Sun in the UK. News International owns media outlets throughout the world including Fox News.
Pay Off Fund Established
Sources say that a fund of £20 million has been put aside to pay out of court settlements to more than twenty victims of phone hacking. It is not yet sure if this will be sufficient. Victims want to know the full extent of what was heard. They want to know who it was who hacked into the messages they received and sent and who the information was shared with. Among other things the victims (particularly Mrs Jowell the former Culture Secretary) want to know what role was really played by David Cameron’s former press secretary who resigned his position in January while still denying any knowledge of phone hacking which was, it turns out, common practice.
This story goes on!
The always excellent Bill Whittle gives a comprehensive overview of Barack Obama‘s family history.
http://trevorloudon.com/2011/04/the-enigma-part-1-strange-bedfellows/
Trump Tells A Baffled Anderson Cooper He Has Evidence Obama’s Birth Certificate Is ‘Missing’
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/trump-tells-a-baffled-anderson-cooper-he-has-evidence-obama%e2%80%99s-birth-certificate-is-%e2%80%98missing%e2%80%99/
WHAT IF…
… the media has knowledge that the truth of Obama’s ineligibility is about to break, and in order to cover their lying butts they are all coming out now in feverish force, so that their records are unequivocally clear that they have been steadfast believers in Obama’s veracity?
In other words, if the scandalous truth is revealed, what would the Media’s position HAVE to be in order to survive? Would they not have to feign shock along with emphasizing their clear record of never having doubted Obama?
One way or another they know they come out of this looking bad – real bad. But which way is worse, or “unforgivable” for them: to even hint that they had doubts, but were afraid, or PAID to continue the lie, OR to say, “We saw the document the State of Hawaii claimed was authentic, as well as those two newspaper classifieds announcing Obama’s birth?”
I say they must choose the latter. Better to look fooled than complicit.
Could this be why they are so Birther hyperfocused now? If I’m Murdoch, I’d throw Shep out there in the alligator pit first. Hahahahaha. Alligator’s love to eat reptiles.
Just hypothetical.