Precise reasons for the top-rated host’s dismissal remain clouded, but the move reflected a reversal for the exasperated family that once championed him
Tucker Carlson had dinner with his ultimate boss, Rupert Murdoch, two weeks ago in Los Angeles, and everything seemed just fine.
But according to people familiar with their conversation and Murdoch’s thinking, the 92-year-old billionaire founder of Fox News had grown weary of some of Carlson’s increasingly far-right commentary on his nightly prime-time show — as well as some of the swaggering host’s behind-the-scenes attitude.
At that particular moment, he was disturbed by Carlson’s stance on Ukraine. A graphic on Carlson’s show had referred to Volodymyr Zelensky, president of the besieged nation, as a “Ukrainian pimp,” and the host had repeatedly excoriated the U.S. government for providing aid to its defense against Russian attacks.
These stances had made Carlson a star on Russian state-controlled TV. But they had drawn furious blowback from powerful Republicans who see U.S. support for Ukraine as a bulwark in a fight for freedom and democracy — some of whom had Murdoch’s ear. After one such on-air segment in mid-March, Murdoch joined a Fox newsroom meeting to loudly challenge Carlson’s message, according to people familiar with the meeting, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of newsroom confidentiality policies.
Jimmy Kimmel, Desi Lydic, Jimmy Fallon and other comedians poked fun at Tucker Carlson’s split with Fox News during their shows April 24. (Video: Julie Yoon/The Washington Post)
Two days after Fox News abruptly fired its top-rated host, ambiguity still swirled around the question of how exactly Carlson, a major influencer in GOP politics, had fallen from grace so quickly within a network that soared to success by catering to conservative audiences.
But interviews with people inside Fox or close to the situation made it clear that the decision rested with the powerful family that controls the company, who finally determined that Carlson was more trouble than he was worth.
Where can Tucker Carlson and Don Lemon go now?
When Fox News CEO Suzanne Scott called Carlson on Monday morning to tell him he would be “parting ways” with the network, the host repeatedly asked why, according to people familiar with the conversation. Scott would only tell him that the decision came “from above” — meaning Rupert Murdoch and his son Lachlan, CEO of Fox Corp.
Scott and Lachlan Murdoch had made the decision to fire Carlson on Friday evening, and Lachlan spoke to his father about it on Saturday, according to two people familiar with the discussion. The decision also came after months of tension and complaints within Fox about Carlson’s lack of respect for Fox’s upper ranks.
The move was a shock for Carlson. The frequently incendiary host had often touted to colleagues the extent to which he felt protected by the Murdochs, who he said offered him editorial freedom that no other media outlet would.
Indeed, Carlson had skirted the kind of controversy that could have been a career-killer for any other TV personality, as the subject of repeated advertising boycotts and caustic criticism for his disparaging comments about immigrants, smirking attempts to downplay the dangers of white supremacy and mockery of efforts to fight the coronavirus pandemic. In 2020, his chief writer resigned after he was revealed to have been posting racist and sexist rants on a covert online forum.
By the end, Carlson’s main advertiser was MyPillow, the company owned by far-right conspiracy theorist Mike Lindell. But Fox publicly stood by the host — until Monday.
The announcement came just days after Fox settled with Dominion Voting Systems, the company that had sued over false claims of election-fraud conspiracy theories, for a whopping $787.5 million. This triggered a flurry of competing theories about the reasons for Carlson’s dismissal, but people familiar with the company’s thinking say the timing of the move was simple: The Murdochs did not want to make a big decision regarding such a pivotal figure until after the case was resolved.
On April 18 Fox News agreed to pay $787.5 million to Dominion Voting Systems potentially avoiding a lengthy trial. (Video: Michael Cadenhead/The Washington Post)
People familiar with the matter told The Washington Post that Carlson’s private communications — released alongside those of numerous other Fox employees during the discovery process of the lawsuit — were key to his departure. Some of those communications were redacted at the request of Fox attorneys but have been viewed by top executives. And while Carlson leveled plenty of critiques of Fox top brass in documents that were made public, some of the most sensitive and damaging material remains hidden, these people said. In one redacted exchange, according to people familiar with the documents, he referred to a woman who is a senior communications executive for Fox as a “c—.” (Carlson used the same sexist vulgarity to describe a female Trump-affiliated lawyer in a message previously made public by the court.)
What Tucker Carlson said about Trump in private texts vs. on Fox News
Neither Fox nor Carlson are speaking publicly about what happened. A Fox News spokeswoman said she could not go beyond a simple “agreed to part ways” statement released Monday.
Carlson on Wednesday night released a two-minute video on Twitter in which he made no mention of Fox or his firing other than alluding to “step[ping] outside the noise for a few days” and criticizing television debates as “unbelievably stupid,” stifled by media bosses. He hinted at a future project: “Where can you still find Americans saying true things? There aren’t many places left, but there are some,” he added. “See you soon.”
In a vacuum of information, people close to the company have been left to speculate about what happened — especially considering that other on-air stars did far more than Carlson to push the conspiracy theories that landed Fox in legal jeopardy — and what might happen next. The future of Fox host Maria Bartiromo, who factored significantly into Dominion’s legal claims, has been the subject of much internal speculation among network employees.
“I was surprised that Tucker was the one to go,” said Joseph Azam, a former senior vice president at Murdoch-controlled News Corp. who resigned in 2019 over Fox’s anti-Muslim rhetoric. He noted that Rupert Murdoch “doesn’t really bet against himself and he doesn’t like losing money, and Tucker was generating plenty of that, so I assume it was a deeply personal decision.”
Carlson’s contract, according to a person familiar with it, was renewed in 2021 and is worth roughly $20 million a year. He has retained Los Angeles attorney Bryan Freedman, who is also representing Don Lemon in his separation from CNN and who previously represented Megyn Kelly in her separation from NBC, according to a person familiar with the matter.
Fox News generates roughly 70 percent of its parent company’s pretax profit, according to an analysis by Bloomberg, and Carlson was its biggest prime-time star, which leaves a hole in the lineup and a question about the network’s financial future.
One popular theory inside Fox is that Carlson’s firing is a sign that the Murdochs are preparing to sell the company. Yet any such sale would require the sign-off of the trust that controls both Fox and its sister company News Corp., which owns the Wall Street Journal, the New York Post and the Times of London. Control of the trust is split between Rupert Murdoch and his four adult children, and no approach to trust representatives has been made.
Meanwhile, a person close to the family, speaking on condition of anonymity to preserve relationships, said that if the Murdochs wanted to sell the company, they probably would have kept one of its biggest revenue draws: Tucker Carlson.
Elahe Izadi contributed to this report.
It is common knowledge that Dominion did interfere in the 2020 election, and it would appear that a T-O-N of proof has come to light saying that exact same thing. But, as we have sadly & discouragingly learned over the last 3 years, knowing the truth, and having it come out in a court of law, (especially when the courts are crooked as well), are two entirely different things. If the Judicial Branch were not so corrupt, the prisons would be FULL of all these thieving, lying, coniving politicians, all the so-called “public servents”, all the media figures…….in other words, all those “elite” in our society. But, what do we have instead – J6’ers STILL rotting in prison as though we are in some 3rd world banana republic, political endictments of anyone conservative……the list is simply too endless to keep expounding upon.