Archbishop Viganò Urges Swiss Guards to Detain Pope Francis Over Scandalous Theological Work
In an extraordinary development causing surprise within the Catholic community, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò has urged the Swiss Guards to take decisive measures against Pope Francis and Cardinal Victor Manuel “Tucho” Fernandez. This striking plea follows the disclosure of a sexually explicit theological piece authored by Fernandez, characterized as pornographic and in opposition to the faith.
Archbishop Viganò’s protest goes beyond a response to the book’s content; it represents the culmination of what he views as a sequence of offenses within the Church. He alleges that the current papacy is methodically undermining the fundamental tenets of the Catholic faith. According to him, apprehending these figures is deemed necessary to safeguard the See of Peter and preserve the sanctity of the Church.
Viganò’s statement serves as a harsh criticism of the Church’s direction throughout the last century. He identifies a trend of infiltration and subversion within the Church, drawing parallels to the strategies employed by secular governments. The Archbishop contends that a succession of concessions and tolerances has brought about the present state of affairs, characterizing the Vatican as having been diminished to a “brothel.”
The Archbishop has openly expressed criticism of what he refers to as the “deep church” and its association with globalist agendas. He has previously voiced objections to the veneration of Pachamama, the Abu Dhabi Declaration, and other occurrences that, in his view, signify a deviation from traditional Catholic values and discipline.
In his appeal for action, Viganò directs his message not only to the Swiss Guards but to the wider Catholic community. He encourages a united stand against influences aiming to weaken the Church, emphasizing the need for a rediscovery of the fundamental principles of the faith. He advocates for a rejection of modernist interpretations that dilute the core message of Catholicism.
Reactions to Viganò’s appeal have been varied, with some commending his bravery in defending the faith, while others express concerns about the potential divisiveness stemming from such actions. This situation underscores the profound divisions within the Church and the difficulties it encounters in harmonizing tradition with contemporary concerns.
As the narrative develops, the global audience observes with anticipation to witness how the Vatican will address this assertive challenge to its authority. The consequences of this confrontation are extensive, with the potential to establish a significant alteration in the power dynamics within the Catholic Church.
https://twitter.com/dianemontagna/status/1744337098923024466
BREAKING: A perverse & pornographic book written by DDF Prefect Cardinal Víctor Fernández in 1998—3 years after “The Art of Kissing”—has been discovered in Argentina. Titled “Mystical Passion: Spirituality & Sensuality”, its Chapters 7, 8 & 9 are too explicit to post here (1/2):
Those who found the book—not wanting it to be seen by the public because of its blasphemous & explicit content—intended to send it to Cardinals, but it was leaked. As reports—& likely passages—are published today, will #PopeFrancis remove Fernández head of Doctrine of the Faith?
*as head of the #Vatican Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith.
Just to confirm: I have the book in Spanish along with an English translation of its most explicit chapters (7, 8, & 9), but their contents are too lewd & explicit to post here. The volume is included here on the list of books by Víctor Manuel Fernández: https://bibliografiadevictorfernandez.blogspot.com/2012/02/publicaciones-de-victor-manuel.html
List of works by Víctor Manuel Fernández: h/t
The list of works by Fernández posted above—which includes the perverse book in question—was from the Catholic University of Argentina where he served as rector. However, it was not listed by the #Vatican when he was appointed prefect of the DDF on July 1: https://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/en/bollettino/pubblico/2023/07/01/230701a.html
Henry Hereford @henry_hereford
You may find this interesting. The argument that the FS blessing is upon persons, not sin, may have a completely different meaning in the minds of homosexual critics of the Church:
The homosexual revolution in theology is not new. It has a long history (and bibliography) through the study of which we can understand where things started and where they are headed to. Historically, one of the arguments of homosexual apologists against the Church’s condemnation of homosexuality as a mortal sin is that the Church, especially the early Church, viewed homosexuality only as sinful sexual acts and failed to have a conception of homosexuals as persons to whom homosexual acts are an expression of their nature.
To homosexual apologists, a new concept of homosexuality has finally emerged in Western societies, a concept that recognizes the existence of homosexual persons as a legitimate manifestation of human nature. This conceptual change, in their view, makes it necessary to reform the Church’s understanding of homosexuality as a sin. After all, if homosexuality is not about acts but about persons, how can you say that God created sinful persons?
In short, the establishment of the idea of a homosexual a legitimate kind of human person is one of the main foundations of the theological criticism against the traditional condemnation by the Church of homosexual desires and acts.
Now, here is something else to think about: Why now do apologists of Fiducia Supplicans insist that priests will be blessing persons and not sinful acts?
Did they miss the homosexual apologists’ argument that it is precisely the recognition of homosexuality as a legitimate manifestation of human personhood that makes it not sinful? If the blessing is bestowed a homosexual person who understands his homosexuality as WILLED by God, what exactly is the meaning of such blessing?
Besides, according to Fr. James Alison, an important homosexual theologian from England, the very existence of homosexual persons is a blessing. https://shorturl.at/jzO49
I fully agree with Vigano. Francis, can’t call him Pope, is the most Unpope like person I can remember seeing, from the moment he walked through the door, he did everything possible to go against tradition. I have been so disappointed in his behavior. This is one time in my life I am thankful I am not a Catholic even though I always thought so much of the religion. My friends that are Catholic have been very disappointed.