CATES’ TAKE

BRIAN CATES POSTS AT TELEGRAM.

“Remember what was happening back in 1973 when the SCOTUS suddenly short-circuited the process by striking down all laws prohibiting abortion in all 50 states.  THE STATES WERE ARGUING IT OUT THEMSELVES.  The SCOTUS took the debate away from the states by suddenly “finding” a previously unknown and unrecognized ‘right’ to abortion in the 4th Amendment’s right to privacy clause.

Democrats have fought for 40+ years to keep the issue from being returned to the states, using a bogus constitutional right argument that no longer stands.  The practice won’t be banned even if Roe is overturned. What would happen is each state would be allowed to set their on limits on abortion, instead of a one-size-fits-all for the entire country, which is what the Liberals want.

States have been changing their legal abortion limits in recent years to reflect the advance of medical technology as it has pushed back the viability of unborn human beings.  When Justice Brennan wrote Roe v. Wade and hinged the decision on the ‘viability’ argument, saving a premature infant at 28 weeks was unheard of.  5 of the justices are clearly ready to rule that the viability argument has been rendered moot by the advance of technology in which 24 week infants are being saved regularly.

Since viability has been rendered obsolete, and many states are recognizing this by changing their legal abortion limits, and challenges to those changing limits has stood up to court scrutiny, this kind of case was inevitable.

If states have the right to change the legal limits, why was the power to legislate abortion taken away from them by the court back in 1973?  Liberals have been very vocal in recent years about their ultimate goal being abortion without apology or restriction up to the day of birth.  We saw several prominent examples of that just in the last 2 years.  But such a goal could never have been constitutionally admitted, and even Roe V. Wade doesn’t allow it, and so here we are.  The Left’s constant relentless push for later and later abortions [while until recently denying that was what they wanted] led to the issue coming up again when many states responded by lowering the legal limits instead of raising them.  This put the issue of whether states have the power to lower their legal limits before the court.  My home state of Texas lowered it’s legal limit from 28 to 20 weeks back in 2014. Which led to this vapid witch getting famous when she filibustered the bill the first time it was up for a vote, and successfu…

And it is here that Cates realized Telegram has a text limit. Too bad. It was a good piece.

Ah… there is more!

…Davis successfully killed the bill the first time it was up for a vote. Rick Perry simply scheduled ANOTHER VOTE and it passed by an even WIDER margin that it did the first time. And the 2nd time around, Wendy and her pink tennis shoes decided not to fight it. 

https://www.mysanantonio.com/news/local/article/Wendy-Davis-gets-Texas-Monthly-s-2014-Bum-Steer-5950115.php

Speaking of pieces, good and bad… Cates took on Sundance at The Conservative Treehouse, aka “The Last Refuge”

Ah, the good old days.  Remember when?

There’s being off the mark by a bit, then there’s being wrong, and then there’s being disastrously wrong.


Yes, this actually  happened. I watched it unfold in real time.  Last Refuge/Sundance claimed to have learned the identity of one of Durham’s investigators.  He supposedly gave this investigator ‘key evidence’ and set a deadline for the Durham office to publicly release it.  If they did not make a public announcement, he threatened to release the investigator’s name.  In other words, to doxx him.

Stay in your lane. Do not try to play games with these people in the Durham SCO.

If you think you can force a leak out of the Durham SCO, consider this:  They knew a top Clinton flunky was a Steele Dossier source and they sat on that key and very relevant evidence and did not release it to the public until John Durham was good and damn ready to release it.  Over 5 years.  And you thought you could play with these people?

Who only figured out this past June that wiping their phones didn’t hide anything from the federal grand jury investigating them?  Stand by for a series of pictures:

Hey, go ahead and wipe those phones before you turn’em over. Heck, wipe’em 3 or 4 times, for all the good it’ll do.

Let me take you on a walk down memory lane:

Members of Mueller’s team ‘wiped’ phones during Trump probe: DOJ

More than two dozen cell phones belonging to members of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team were “wiped” clean of their data before the Justice Department’s inspector general could check

https://nypost.com/2020/09/11/members-of-muellers-team-wiped-phones-during-trump-probe-doj/

At Least 27 Phones from Special Counsel’s Office Were Wiped before DOJ Inspector General Could Review Them

More than two dozen phones belonging to members of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team were wiped clean of data before the Justice Department’s inspector general could comb them for records, the DOJ said in records released Thursday.At least 27 cell phones were wiped of data before the DOJ inspector general could review them, some reset to factory settings and some wiped “accidentally” after the wrong password was entered too many times, according to 87 pages of DOJ records regarding the phones issued to members of the special counsel’s office. Including mobile phones that were “reassigned,” the Special Counsel’s office wiped a total of 31 phones.> NEWS: At least 27 phones used by the Mueller team were wiped before they could be checked for records.> > Some phones just wiped themselves, in other cases there was mass password amnesia that required resets.> >

Source ppg. 49-52: https://t.co/DUjvvVd8Ke> > — Ivan Pentchoukov (@IvanPentchoukov) September 10, 2020A phone belong to assistant special counsel James…

You don’t need physical access to a phone to see what’s on it if you’ve got a U.S. Attorney or a Special Counsel with a seated federal grand jury that has issued a very secret search warrant subpoena for all the phone/text/email records to the target’s phone provider.

I was saying at the time that huge media blitz about “OMG THE MUELLER TEAM WIPED THEIR PHONES NOW WE’LL NEVER KNOW WHAT THEY DID!!11!!!” was in full swing that we didn’t need the phones and wiping the phones didn’t stop anything.

I’m sure the 3 1/2 years the federal grand jury was spying on Schifty and Swalwell they thought changing phones or wiping their phones or whatever was covering their tracks.  Oops.

Apparently Weissman, Van Grack and all the corrupt members of the corrupt Mueller Special Counsel team thought the same thing: wipe the phones, they’ll never prove anything.

Let me remind you yet again who’s scope was expanded to exhaustively investigate how the Mueller Special Counsel prosecuted the cases it handled:

Yes, they tried to hide what they had done. No, they didn’t get away with it.  And you can quote me on that.

Durham’s focused on the RussiaGate stuff right now. But don’t worry, Mueller Special Counsel team!  Your turn is coming.

It’s almost as if somebody perfectly positioned the corrupt Mueller Special Counsel to be investigated by someone who would be coming right behind them. A-L-M-O-S-T.

“You think they’ll figure it out in time?” …

By Radiopatriot

A former talk radio host turned political activist, diving deep into the intricacies of political warfare and sharing insights on the shadow government and 5th Generation Psy-Ops. RadioPatriot's been diving into political intrigue, from FBI hearings to questioning staged events. Twitter.com/RadioPatriot * Telegram/Radiopatriot * Telegram/Andrea Shea King Gettr/radiopatriot * TRUTHsocial/Radiopatriot

2 comments

  1. As much as I am ready for movie to be over, some great stuff coming. Can’t wait to see Sessions back!

Leave a Reply

Discover more from The Radio Patriot

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading