Topic: Elections
by Capt. Seth Keshel
Ple-na-ry
Definition: unqualified; absolute
If you’ve read this journal for more than a hot minute, you certainly realize by now that I am no fan of “crying wolf,” or passing out ill-advised theories that don’t hold water when they are challenged.
For instance, I have never been on board with the theory that the major mechanism of election fraud in 2020 was for Trump votes to be converted by the machines, themselves just glass and plastic, to Biden votes. Why? Because Trump had 74 million votes in the 2020 election, 11 million more than he had four years prior. It only makes sense to me that Biden is the one receiving counterfeit votes.
I believe electronic manipulation of election results takes place in many forms, and since electronic voting renders our elections practically not auditable, our elections are not transparent.
Those casting a vote in-person on a voting machine are throwing a vote into a black box, which is transported by thumb drive to a central count station, if indeed those votes make it there at all (they may not if they are known to come from a massive Republican stronghold in the middle of a close race).
On March 8, just two weeks after presenting election testimony before the Arizona Senate, I advised patriots to research the plenary power of the Arizona legislature, particularly regarding elections.
On March 30, the Arizona Senate passed Concurrent Resolution 1037, and the legislature transmitted this resolution to the Secretary of State four days later.
This resolution was passed because the fraudulent Governor of Arizona, Katie Hobbs, vetoed Senate Bill 1074, which purposed to achieve the same goals as C.R. 1037 – namely to protect critical infrastructure, which includes elections infrastructure, as specified by U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson on January 17, 2017, just three days before President Trump took office.
Today, Arizona Senate Majority Leader and Marine Corps veteran Sonny Borrelli informed all 15 Arizona County Boards of Supervisors that they are not authorized to use voting machines in the upcoming 2024 Presidential Election. Borrelli’s news release contained this commentary:
The federal government has made it very clear that elections equipment is considered a target by those who want to threaten the safety and security of our country.
We have long ignored this elephant in the room by allowing electronic voting systems made with parts produced in countries considered adversaries to the United States to be used as the primary method for conducting our elections.
It is in our state’s and nation’s best interest that we comply with implementation of security measures to protect our republic.
The actions of the Arizona legislature, accomplished with a bare majority, are nothing short of outstanding and courageous. As Borrelli’s statement outlines, the legislature satisfies the federal government’s mandate to protect critical national infrastructure while capitalizing on the Category 5 dumpster fire occurring in the Arizona courts at this very moment, as Maricopa County’s deliberate corruption of their own election is laid in plain sight for all to see.
Borrelli’s letter to the county chairs is seen above. In it, he references the authority of the Arizona legislature to act under the United States Constitution, our Supreme Law under God, to protect critical infrastructure.
…it is now incumbent upon the Legislature to exercise our plenary authority. Enshrined in Article 1, Section 4, Clause 1 of the United States Constitution, “times, places and manner” of conducting federal elections specifically conveys electronic voting systems (manner) are not mandated in statute to be used as a primary method for counting, tabulating or verification.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
1) This will undoubtedly be taken up in Arizona’s courts, likely at the behest of a lawsuit from the Arizona Secretary of State, Adrian Fontes, who was “elected” in the same garbage heap of an election Hobbs was. How the courts will rule, despite the clear authority of the legislature to stipulate the conduct of elections in a state, is anyone’s guess.
2) If successful in rescuing Arizona’s elections, the Arizona Senate will be remembered through the ages for delivering such an important defense of freedom in a time of crisis.
3) Arizona’s mail-in voting system is being gutted by the testimony of Kari Lake’s legal team, and regardless of Judge Peter Thompson’s ruling in that case, will certainly face a mandate for reform that may cripple Democrat chances of stealing Arizona’s 11 electoral votes in 2024.
4) Having ballots cast in person at the precinct and on paper will require rapid effort to find election volunteers to staff and execute our elections, as well as to count and report the votes, should this Resolution withstand legal scrutiny.
5) The Constitution will never fail us, and I hope to see more legislatures with the guts to pass a resolution like this around a dug-in governor.
Please share this info with those in your circle.
Since elections are a matter of national security, I would also propose having them conducted by the national guard.