And – a few key questions for Durham
by TechnoFog
A deal that would almost make Jeffrey Epstein jealous.
Special Counsel John Durham will testify publicly tomorrow morning. Assume for a moment that Durham will mostly stay within the findings of his report and also discuss that which was divulged in the Michael Sussmann and Igor Danchenko trial. Here are a few questions (out of many) that we’d like to see answered:
- During the Sussmann trial, former FBI Special Agent Allison Sands testified that a confidential source had access to the Alfa Bank white paper and concluded that its allegations were “plausible.” This CHS (Confidential Human Source), who is referenced on page 263 of the Durham Report, was allegedly part of calls“ arranged by Trump’s Campaign Media Coordinator, Hope Hicks.” Who was that CHS?
- Who in the FBI approved Igor Danchenko as a CHS, and did the FBI delay that revelation to Durham’s team?
- Durham’s Report states that Brian Auten “recalled that in September 2017 Deputy Assistant Director David Archey informed the team that they should cease work on attempting to corroborate the Steele Reports.” On that same page, notes from one Mueller FBI analyst state that “Mueller investigation leadership” directed them to “dedicate no resources” to investigating Charles Dolan, who ended up being the source of Steele’s subsource. Which members of the Mueller team gave that directive?
- In other words, which members of the Mueller Special Counsel directed their team to cease work on attempting to corroborate the Steele Reports?
- At the time Mueller’s leadership directed their team to cease work on corroborating the Steele Reports, did the Mueller team remain obligated to update the FISC with new material facts that disproved the claims made in the FISA warrants? By shutting down inquiry into the Steele Reports, did the Mueller Special Counsel actually protect itself?
- Durham said that “it seems highly likely that, at a minimum, confirmation bias played a significant role in the FBI’s acceptance” of the Trump/Russia collusion allegations. “Confirmation bias” according to page 303 of the Report “stands for the general proposition that there is a common human tendency—mostly unintentional—for people to accept information and evidence that is consistent with what they believe to be true, while ignoring or rejecting information that challenges those beliefs.”
- How can “confirmation bias” be estimated where the Durham team failed to interview many key players, such as Comey and McCabe?
- “Confirmation bias” requires the person to believe the allegations to be true. Doesn’t the Report give repeated examples of instances where members of the FBI did not believe the Trump/Russia allegations, such as Peter Strzok saying “there’s nothing to this” (page 60), internal discussions that Crossfire Hurricane was “thin” (page 60), and one Supervisory Special Agent’s conclusion (page 104) that Carter Page “was not a witting agent of the Russian government”?
- Did James Comey say it was “confirmation bias” when he demanded the FISA warrants and ignored intelligence that it was Hillary Clinton’s plan to smear Donald Trump with the Russian allegations?
- Did the Mueller Special Counsel say that “confirmation bias” caused them to shut down the investigation of the Steele Reports?
- Does the “confirmation bias” assessment contradict other findings of the Report that detail that decisions were made based on “political or personal bias”?
According to the DOJ: “FARA requires certain agents of foreign principals who are engaged in political activities or other activities specified under the statute to make periodic public disclosure of their relationship with the foreign principal, as well as activities, receipts and disbursements in support of those activities.”
Comments:
“David C. Weiss, U.S. Attorney for the District of Delaware, made the announcement. The investigation is ongoing.”
That’s a dodge. It gives Garland, Wray, and everyone else in the DOJ the excuse they need not to answer any questions.
If I hear Wray say one more time, “I have to be careful here…” I’m going to vomit.”
He should have never been appointed by Trump. I saw the Trump interview w/ Bret and I can tell that Donald Trump has learned a lot of lessons. He is still Donald Trump. IF HE DOES WIN I am sure THIS TIME HE WILL REMEMBER LISTEN TO HIS GUT INSTINCTS. The entire 7th floor of the FBI and then some should be completely gutted and everyone should be “given” Polygraphs.. the older FBI swamp agents should just be given the retirement package. Wray was a shill from the get go. OH well I need to go. I know what you mean.
“Need this deal before his father is no longer president and can’t offer him the protection he can right now.”
Everything the DOJ-FBI (and other three-letter agencies) have been doing makes sense when one examines with the following premise(s) in mind:
1) The USA has for decades been the subject of a Communist-style “top down / bottom up” type of takeover (see, e.g., the book “And Not a Shot is Fired) and 1980’s interviews with Yuri Bezmenov. Or even the new documentary “Pandemic 3: The Great Awakening.”
2) Think of Collectivism as a genus, and Communism, Socialism, Climatism, Globalism, Fascism and Progressivism as species within the genus Collectivism. What is currently engaged in the takeout of the United States of America as a Constitutional Republic is a combination of those species or, at least, what they intend to impose globally will be such a combination (e.g., the “Great Reset” resembles a type of Corporatist Fascism, albeit with the corporations superior to the state, and not vice-versa). I refer to this alliance as the “Globalist-CCP Axis.”
3) It went really active – executing toward final consummation – under Saul Alinsky acolyte B. Hussein Obama, raised from a young age to be a Communist revolutionary (see, e.g., Frank Marshall Davis, or Stanley Kurtz’s book “Radical in Chief”). It may even have started active execution phase under Alinsky acolyte Hillary Rodham Clinton in the 1990’s.
4) A major, perhaps the major component of the execution toward final consummation phase was the subversion of the DOJ (and other three letters agencies), the “intelligence community” and military officer corps via “personnel is policy” under Obama. That is, purging through termination and/or just not promoting any with fealty to their Constitutional oath, or patriotism in general. They being displaced by ideologues and fellow-travelers … and those identified who would just go along, follow any order or instruction, in order to keep their pension (etc.).
5) Trump beating the machine algorithms in 2016 upset the timetable. Worse (from their standpoint), he represented a potential existential threat to the entire revolutionary enterprise. Thus, he had to be hobbled throughout his administration “by any means necessary,” including attempts to remove him via impeachment efforts on fabricated bases.
6) Critical too was stopping a reoccurrence of 2016, and so preparing a “color revolution” / coup to prevent him from serving a second term (to which he was, in fact, duly elected).
Once we keep those premises in mind, EVERYTHING that the unelected Biden-Harris Junta is doing makes perfect sense, and is even predictable. So too with its subsidiaries, the DOJ-FBI, etc.
This includes the DOJ acting Soviet; and executing “two tiers” of justice persecuting opponents of the regime (such as the J6 counter-revolutionaries), persecuting President Trump, and persecuting all the way down to parents speaking out at school committees. All are considered “reactionaries,” counter-revolutionaries and so enemies of the state.
Relatedly, acting Soviet in protecting those of the regime (the Clintons, the Clinton Foundation, the Bidens), and those allied to, or useful to the regime (e.g., Antifa, BLM).
Doesn’t it all make sense now?
Frankly, I expected as much. As I mentioned before, I read the Laptop from Hell, chock full of information about the millions of dollars which were funneled via many banks, shell corporations, and then the sordid affairs by Hunter Biden and the BIG Guy. None of that was used, the FBI whistleblowers info was not used and I just heard a lot of the information turned over to Comer’s committee was massively redacted.
As Wesley Snipes fan (yes I am).. I heard that even his attorney commented on Twitter. WOW. Sweetheart deal .. that is an interesting way of putting it.. don’t you think? There is nothing SWEET about it. Except for Hunter and the Big Guy, who stick to their lying stories.
https://technofog.substack.com/p/hunter-bidens-sweetheart-plea-deal/comments
