“Thank you Tucker. For everyone listening, later today I will have a thread up pinned to my profile showing all the receipts, by timestamp, for all the points made in this video.” – @MikeBenzCyber
The Twitter Coup Part 1
This was originally published on December 22, 2022
Preliminary Statement
Over the past four years, U.S. District Court Judge Valerie Caproni has presided over three cases in which the author was a litigant.
(Case 1:18-cv-08653-VEC-SDA, Case 1:20-cv-07269-VEC-OTW, Case 1:21-cv-10627-VEC)
In two of the cases, the author was opposed by Adam Sharp. Facts surrounding an alleged relationship between Caproni and Sharp were unknown prior to researching and writing this article in December 2022. A motion to disqualify Caproni was denied on January 10, 2022 (Case 1:21-cv-10627-VEC Document 17).
Recusal is warranted in cases where, “a reasonable person, knowing all the facts would have doubts about the judge’s ability to be impartial in the case.” Judges may also recuse themselves to avoid the appearance of conflicts of interest.
The Fundamental Transformation of America
Elon Musk’s “Twitter Files” reveal a deeply troubling, previously hidden relationship between federal law enforcement and private sector social media companies, but an important question remains unanswered. Who could have executed such a vast government infiltration of private industry and how could they overcome the technical and legal hurdles? As implausible as it seems, this all occurred in plain sight right under our noses over the past two decades.
Evidence in the public domain is likely to prove that former President Barack Obama, former FBI General Counsel Valerie Caproni, and Twitter’s former Government Liaison Adam Sharp, were the three most important conspirators at the outset. It appears they worked together and with others to launch one of the most sinister and sophisticated crimes in our nation’s history.
From Weatherman to U.S. President — The Rise of Barack Obama
Just after his historic Presidential win, the New York Times ran a story about
How Obama Tapped Into Social Networks’ Power
Journalist David Carr wrote, “In February 2007, a friend called Marc Andreessen, a founder of Netscape and a board member of Facebook and asked if he wanted to meet with a man with an idea that sounded preposterous on its face.” Carr never reveals the identity of Andreessen’s friend but goes on to depict Obama as the genius behind a grass roots campaign facilitated by emerging technology.
In 2015, long after Ayers and Dohrn helped the obscure Illinois State Senator rise to international prominence, President Obama held a technology summit at Stanford University. After delivering remarks on the future of technology and industry, Obama signed
Executive Order 13691 Promoting Private Sector Cybersecurity Information Sharing
In it, the President commanded that, “private companies, nonprofit organizations, executive departments and agencies (agencies), and other entities must be able to share information related to cybersecurity risks and incidents and collaborate to respond in as close to real time as possible.” Stanford students in attendance were probably unaware, but this order codified long standing FBI demands to supersede the fourth amendment and investigate anyone they wanted. This paved the way for the Neo-fascism now being exposed in the ongoing releases of the “Twitter Files”.
Making good on his campaign promise, Obama ensured that America would be fundamentally transformed from a Constitutional Republic into a Neo-fascist Technocratic Autocracy. This new authority would be enforced by a digitally enabled Super-Stasi made up of FBI InfraGard members,
and other contractors including hundreds, perhaps even thousands of ordinary citizens patrolling on-line as America’s Secret Police.
Such an Orwellian overthrow would be calculated to happen without anyone noticing until it was too late. The merger of government and corporate technological power enabled a class of politically aligned bureaucratic elites to maintain control by monitoring and stifling opposition rather than allowing open debate in a free marketplace of ideas. These traitors have trampled the Constitution and destroyed the most fundamental aspect of American greatness.
MIKE BENZ: “It looks very bad.” How did they do it? According to censorship expert
a concerted effort, starting in April 2020, was made by a coalition involving the DHS, NATO, the DNC, and other entities to launch a mass censorship campaign across all social media platforms. This campaign aimed to pre-emptively censor any disputes over the legitimacy of mail-in ballots.
Four key institutions were part of this effort:
• Stanford University
• The University of Washington
• Graphika
• The Atlantic Council
Benz described these entities as “Pentagon cutouts,” suggesting they were operating under the influence or direction of the Pentagon to carry out the censorship campaign.
These entities pressured and compelled social media companies to adopt a new category of speech violation termed “delegitimization.”
This policy was broad in scope, encompassing any form of content that could be interpreted as challenging the legitimacy of mail-in voting, early voting dropboxes, or the tabulation of ballots on election day.
This pressure was not merely advisory but was backed by the implication of potential governmental force or repercussions for non-compliance. This included direct communication channels with tech company executives to facilitate rapid takedown requests.
As a consequence, this concerted censorship effort led to the removal or throttling of potentially hundreds of millions of posts, particularly those questioning the security of mail-in ballots.
The following excerpt from Benz highlights the most important aspect:
“Now, they did this seven months before the election because, at the time, they were worried about the perceived legitimacy of a Biden victory in the case of a so-called ‘red mirage, blue shift event.
“They knew the only way that Biden would be able to win, mathematically, was through the disproportionate Democrat use of mail-in ballots.
“They knew there would be a crisis because it was going to look extremely weird if Trump looked like he won by seven states and then, three days later, it came out actually the election switched.
“I mean, that would put the election crisis of the Bush-Gore election on a level of steroids that the national security state said, well, the public will not be prepared for. So what we need to do is we need to, in advance, we need to pre-censor the ability to even question legitimacy. This took out hundreds of key influencers.”
TUCKER CARLSON: “So what you’re saying is … they knew the outcome of the election seven months before it was held?”
MIKE BENZ: “It looks very bad.”
Who will hang?