Why Trump Wants Hegseth at Defense
He seems to want a culture warrior to take on the military brass. There are bigger security issues.
The Editorial Board. Nov. 13, 2024 at 5:50 pm
Donald Trump has quickly filled the top ranks of his national security team, and for the most part they’re politicians with solid experience and understanding of today’s security threats. The main wild card is Pete Hegseth, the Fox News personality and decorated Army veteran, who will get close Senate scrutiny as the nominee to be Secretary of Defense.
The choice of Mr. Hegseth has shocked many in Washington, and that by itself might be a recommendation. He could hardly do worse than the so-called adults in the room of recent years. The armed services can’t make their recruiting quotas, America’s military industrial base has been exposed as inadequate with little protest from Pentagon leaders, and no one in the civilian or military ranks was held accountable for the Afghanistan debacle.
The 44-year-old Mr. Hegseth has combat experience in Afghanistan and Iraq and has maintained his military ties as an officer in the National Guard. He has been an advocate for veterans, both on TV and as a member of veterans groups. He’s smart and telegenic.
***
Yet he’s never run a big institution, much less one of the largest and most hidebound on the planet. He has no experience in government outside the military, and no small risk is that the bureaucracy will eat him alive.
Another concern is why Mr. Trump seems to have chosen Mr. Hegseth. The nominee’s focus in recent years has been attacking the Pentagon for its woke policies on transgender and racial equity. He has made a cause of opposing women in combat, though women have shown they can perform well in many roles. Mr. Trump seems to want Mr. Hegseth to wage a culture war against the military brass.
(ya think? 🤭 )
The Biden-era woke excesses need to be cleaned up, not least for recruiting from military families who have long prized the service for its devotion to excellence. Peacetime militaries tend to lapse into promotion based on administrative skill rather than war-fighting capability. But in the context of America’s security challenges, wokeness is a small concern.
The military isn’t Mr. Trump’s enemy, and a purge mentality will court political trouble and demoralize the ranks. The draft executive order, leaked to the press, about forming a group of former officers to rule on the fitness of current generals would be a mistake that smacks of politicizing the officer corps.
Firing Chairman of the Joint Chiefs CQ Brown would also be counterproductive. Mr. Trump is still furious about former Chairman Mark Milley’s criticisms, and not without cause, but Mr. Trump promoted Gen. Milley. The better path is to look for officers who understand the current global dangers and have good ideas for what to do about it. Adm. Sam Paparo of the U.S. Indo-Pacific command is one.
The Senate will also want to know what Mr. Hegseth really thinks about today’s main security issues. He was a longtime hawk and supported the use of force abroad. But in recent years he has blown with the MAGA wind against U.S. commitments, notably in Ukraine. The risk is that he will tell Mr. Trump what he wants to hear rather than advising him to the contrary to avoid mistakes.
Successful Defense secretaries have driven a few high priorities, and Mr. Hegseth’s are unknown. Will he press to build three nuclear attack submarines a year to fulfill the Aukus commitment and deter China? What about fast-tracking the production of long-range antiship and other missiles? There are many such urgent priorities, as Michael Gallagher explains nearby. Getting those done would tax even the most seasoned Defense chief.
All of this could make Mr. Hegseth’s confirmation a close call, since Democrats are likely to line up against him. Senate Republicans like Dan Sullivan, Joni Ernst and Roger Wicker are serious about restoring U.S. military capabilities and deterrence. They have an obligation to scrutinize Mr. Hegseth to see if he is the right man to lead the military reform and buildup that America needs.
On Wednesday Mr. Trump named former Democratic Rep. Tulsi Gabbard as director of national intelligence, the White House post that coordinates findings from the 18 U.S. intelligence agencies. Ms. Gabbard is in the Tucker Carlson isolationist wing of the MAGA coalition, which will heighten concern on Capitol Hill that the right person serve at Defense.
***
Mr. Trump’s other selections are likely to get more welcome Senate treatment. Marco Rubio, the Florida Senator picked as Secretary of State, has long experience on foreign affairs and believes in U.S. global leadership. He has focused on the China threat and would likely push to restore U.S. sanctions on Venezuela and do more to combat Cuba’s malign influence in the Western hemisphere.
(Please see my post Marco Rubio, Total Insider)
Managing Administration security debates will be Rep. Mike Waltz, the new national-security adviser. He’s another veteran with hawkish views and led a group of 70 Republicans and 70 Democrats in crafting a framework to counter Iranian aggression. Like Mr. Rubio, he has tempered support for Ukraine of late. But he wrote this month that “If [Vladimir Putin] refuses to talk, Washington can, as Mr. Trump argued, provide more weapons to Ukraine with fewer restrictions on their use.”
Their voices will be needed to counter some of the isolationists surrounding Donald Trump Jr. who carry sway in the White House. Mr. Trump’s first term was a security success because he followed a policy of peace through strength. But the world is more dangerous now, and the mix of his nominees suggests his second term is likely to be a wilder ride.
Copyright ©2024 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8
Appeared in the November 14, 2024, print edition as ‘Why Trump Wants Hegseth at Defense’.
I disagree that the members of our armed forces would not appreciate ridding them of woke, DEI, war monger leadership. Bet you once they are OUT, sign ups go up. We need to be WAR READY, NOT involved across the globe in endless activities where there are no winners and the losers are our men and women returning in boxes or maimed. War should be a very last resort, and then go “scorched earth” with a defined “win”. That’s not what the military industrial complex wants……..for their own glory and finances. Pentagon can’t find assets or pass an audit…..it’s a business, not the game they’re playing! Go Pete!!!
I’d wager — and I think I’d win — that zero (0) staff on the ‘Wall Street Urinal’ Opinion clusterf**k spent one second in U.S. Marine Corps boot camp, much less in ‘basic’ in any of the other branches.
This by-line is golden: “He seems to want a culture warrior to take on the military brass.”
Was he/they looking in the mirror when that comment was written? The irony of accusing Hegseth of being a ‘culture warrior’.
Hegseth didn’t get promoted to Major and earn TWO BRONZE STARS by playing cards or counting water bottles in a combat zone.
I seriously doubt his leadership / personnel management was limited to being a platoon leader, squad leader or even a fire team leader.
The clown(s) who wrote the above opinion piece represent entitled suffering egos whose actual military knowledge comes from commandeering a cubicle in a bloated office on the fourth floor.
I read the comments in the link to the archived ‘Wall Street Urinal’. There were some great comments from those who applied critical thinking… then those who may have served in the military and whose egos equate to the pathetic simps who for some tragic reason felt qualified to give their opinion.
Coarse criticism coming from a supposed retired military officer of another officer reeks of a wound… rather, a wounded ego, which, to me, reflects a lack of knowledge of subjects too long to list here; military professionalism is at the top of that list.
Making the comments he/they did without stating knowledge of the specific experience Hegseth had while on active duty reflected all I needed to see.
That lends me to wonder if said “Imma retired officer with 130 years of blah blah blah service” was only experienced with all five or so versions of ‘Call of Duty’.
That was worth as much as the ‘W S Urinal’ opinions.
As a sergeant in the United States Marine Corps I approve Major Pete Hegseth for Secretary of Defense.
anoldpieceofleather
Screams from a dying regime that is incentivizes war to make money …. Never believing there is a different path. Some will never learn….or accept. Hegseth is my pick.
I’m with you Sarge. No more insider, status quo BS. DOD needs an enema.
His experience says it best. Served his country and was awarded 2 bronze stars. People know him from Fox News and by all appearances seems to be a good family man. I hope he gets through the approval process & wish him well.