Let me summarize for those new to the performance.
(1) The CIA special ops group, organized the Signal App operation. That’s how Goldberg got in.
(2) Jeffrey Goldberg held the story until the day before the scheduled SSCI hearing.
(3) The SSCI uses the hearing to attack the Trump officials at the top of the critical silos.
Why?
The CIA black ops group doesn’t like the Trump Ukraine and Trump Russia policy.
Watch. You’ll see.
Julian’s Rum added this:
How I know this was all a carefully coordinated stage act:
How you know it was a set up…
Goldberg served in Israel’s military. Widow Jobs owns the Atlantic. Jobs is friends with Ghilaine. https://x.com/ItsJuliansRum/status/19047064917911226
It’s a global spiderweb.
Sorry Andrea, but I just have to vent a bit before I go on with my day…….wonder what everyone is going to do with themselves once this is over and our lives go on?
How come the obvious keeps happening and this whole “play” is acted out ad nauseam…..rinse, wash, repeat……even though anyone with half a brain knows it for what it is? Is there THAT much of a drought of news that we STILL have to dwell on CIA inspired stuff …….I am actually getting bored of all the redundancy that’s been going on for this entire last decade….actually all the way back to JFK’s murder if you really want to take it apart…..are we REALLY all this addicted to this constant drama? I’m beginning to give alot of it up, and just quietly going into prayer to ask God to please just get this over and done with……..in His time of course……:) Q keeps us really well informed and most of us can see that the script IS playing out just as described…..STILL the on screen, and in print drama continues like there’s some mystery attached…..actually quite weird…..?? Maybe the reason is some of us have have been awake for TOO long….and it’s getting very tiresome waiting for everyone else to catch up? ……Good article but no surprises in it since those of us who are awake, and have been for a long time now, already know the ending, we ARE winning and GOOD ALWAYS OVERCOMES EVIL…….HAGD all……..:)
You’ve been paying attention for years. Your interest in the subject is well beyond “ready to purchase.” Thus, you are tired of and bored with the same message repeated in various forms. You’ve already bought “the product” and are more than ready to move on. OK. I challenged GROK to give us info about how many times it takes to elicit interest in those who haven’t been aware or paying attention as long as we have… they’ve been apathetic, getting their info from radical biased fake news sources, conditioned with mal-information, in other words, misinformed uninformed citizens. You, on the other hand, have been drumming your fingers on the table, expecting results. NOW! Trump is growing his army by waking up those people who have to be repeatedly exposed to the truth message. Here’s the result:
GROK: I’m thinking interest might take around three to five exposures on average. An article mentions the “Rule of Three” for consumers to act, which could fit interest Quora.
Interest might develop after three exposures for recognition, with more needed for deeper interest. I’m wondering if marketers agree on a standard number for this stage.
The Rule of Seven might cover the whole process, with interest forming earlier, maybe at three to four exposures. This feels like a reasonable guess, but let’s see if we can confirm.
If interest starts at three to four exposures, then three more could lead to “purchase”, totaling seven. I’m thinking this aligns with marketing theories, but it’s still speculative.
Interest might vary by product, with some needing fewer exposures to spark curiosity. I’m considering whether impulse items take less, maybe two to three sightings.
Given the variability, perhaps the answer is a range, like three to seven exposures for interest. Let’s see if studies support this broad estimate.
From the meta-analysis, ten exposures hit maximum attitude, but interest might start earlier. I’m guessing five exposures could spark a positive attitude, leading to interest.
This feels like a reasonable estimate, given recall improves up to eight exposures. By five, consumers likely remember and start considering the product.
Gregory Brown, Chaplin and Professor wrote a very good article, “Satan’s Methods”, in https://bible.org/seriespage/5-satan-s-methods.
God left us with this buckle up truth in Ephesians 6:10-18, see at: https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=ephesians%206:10-18&version=NIV
To Suzi46: A lot of us feel that way, but, keep your joy and sound mind, and peace, and keep praying for King Jesus to work this out according to His plans.
We are all in this together strong and weak. KayD
AMEN!!!
Thankyou!!! Read my comment later today and said to myself….”do NOT write a comment when you’ve had a restless night’s rest and have done way too much late night reading catching up on EVERYTHING….an ‘overload warning’ should flash on my puter screen and tell me to turn the darn thing off and turn out the light…!! :)…..funny thing is I AM the one who goes around telling people to hang in there, be patient, and everything is NOT as it appears……oh well, thanks for the comments Andrea & Kay……now is NOT the time for whining…..lights off at 10:30P tonight…!!!
Good girl!