The media loves rumor and innuendo, right? I mean, 138 articles in seven days about Herman Cain’s suspected sexual pecadillos in Politico. So… how about the media plays it fair for a change and focuses its attention on the “man” in the White House (and be nice, I don’t mean Moochelle). So far, the only newspaper to report on Obama’s gayness are the tabloids.
Kevin DuJan, a self-admitted gay man (and political conservative) has written an explosive piece about Obama’s sexual proclivities. Kevin resides in Chicago and is well-acquainted with the gay community known as “Boystown”, where the low-down on the “down-low” life of Obama is common knowledge. Here’s an excerpt from Hillbuzz.org:
But, for now Barack Obama is the Left’s guy, so he’s getting the full-on Rock Hudson/Liberace protection treatment.
While, of course, opponents of the Left such as Herman Cain are relentlessly attacked with unsubstantiated sexual innuendo in the agenda-driven media’s nonstop effort to discredit and destroy anyone who poses a real threat to Obama’s grasp on power.
If you don’t see what’s really happening here and are someone who’s quick to believe the anonymous and sketchy sources the likes of Politico put forward when it comes to a Republican in the hot seat…then maybe you should spend today coming up with a valid reason for why YOU can’t name a single girlfriend Barack Obama had in his entire life before Michelle and why so much of Barack Obama’s past is so aggressively cloaked in perpetual and deliberate mystery.
***********************
PS — If you ever wonder why Republicans don’t just out Barack Obama themselves, you need to really think about how the Cocktail Party GOP establishment actually works.
There are currently at least two closeted gay sitting Republican United States Senators. There are several closeted gay sitting Republican Congressmen.
All of these men are forever praised in the media for being “bipartisan”, which means they conveniently sell out conservative voters whenever the Left needs them to.
I am 100% convinced there’s blackmail afoot in this, with the quid pro quo being these men get to remain sitting Senators and Congressmen so long as they keep folding whenever Democrats need “bipartisan” votes across the aisle.
It’s no coincidence the closeted gay Republicans are all Cocktail Party GOP establishment types who are more interested in maintaining their own hold on power than ever bucking the system and doing what’s best for this country and their own constituents.
It’s an open secret in the political world that Barack Obama is gay, and that there are plenty of closeted gay Republicans too. But you won’t hear about any of this because members of the permanent political class on both sides of the aisle don’t want you to hear about it.
AND they all think you are too stupid to ever figure this stuff out on your own.
Even though all the clues are really obvious and sitting RIGHT THERE if you really wanted to piece it together without the media’s help.
******************************
And if you don’t think Capitol Hill isn’t a sewer, read this detailed piece about Barney Frank and his Lavender Mafia in the House.
.
Was Sharon Bialek Paid to Lie About Sexual Harrasment against Herman Cain?
http://www.dividedstates.com/sharon-bialek-paid-undislcosed-amount-to-lie-about-herman-cain-sexual-harrasment-charge/
Sharon Bialek Court Papers
* note the attorney:
https://w3.courtlink.lexisnexis.com/cookcounty/Finddock.asp?DocketKey=CAAJ0MB0BFIICG0MD
If you ask me, these sexcapades of Cain’s are NOT AN ISSUE to me. My biggest issue is how conservatives fall for such neocon Leviathan, Federal Reserve, mega govenrment loving idiots like him and call themselves that term. Recently Mike Church (SIRIUS Radio) spoke with TRUE CONSERVATIVE author Tom Woods…
http://www.mikechurch.com/Public-Transcripts/in-search-of-conservatism-among-conservatives.html
And to me my biggest issue with Cain…The Federal Reserve. Well Dr. Laurie Roth, who announced she is running on the American Independence Party ticket, wrote an article last month about Cain and how he DOES NOT WANT an audit of the Fed. THAT is the main issue I have with him and something real thought provoking Constitution loving conservatives like myself need to address. Ron Paul is staying AS FAR AWAY as he can from this. Of course if the idiot bankers in the GOP railroad Dr. Paul, I write in Dr. Roth as a protest of how said banksters are killing the Republic.
http://therothshow.com/2011/10/it-is-time-for-the-smelly-stuff-to-hit-the-federal-reserve-fan/
Questions for Sharon Bialek:
1) What date did this happen?
2) Did you call and tell your your boyfriend the night it happened?
3) Did you call and tell anybody else the night it happened?
4) What was the name of the restaurant where you had dinner?
5) What part of town was the restaurant in?
6) How far was the restaurant from the hotel?
7) Did Herman have a reservation?
8) In 1997, as “things” were different then, did you and Herman draw a lot of looks from people as a very white woman and a very black man together in public?
9) Was Herman wearing a wedding ring?
10) As Herman was a “high profile” black and individual back then, did he run into anybody who knew him by name at the restaurant?
11) Did you have the impression Mr. Cain was well-known at the restaurant?
11) Did he introduce you to the anybody he knew that night?
12) Did you and Herman drink wine with dinner? How much?
13) How many drinks did each of you have before dinner?
14) Had you ever been to NRA headquarters before?
15) What kind of car was Mr. Cain driving?
16) Was there a console between the driver and passenger seat?
17) How much room was there between the steering wheel and Mr. Cain’s crotch?
18) Did he touch your leg with his right or left hand?
19) Did he pronate or supinate his wrist to reach towards your genitals or did he simply push your dress all the way up in order to access the area of your genitals?
20) Was the pleated skirt you were weighing of a tight or loose variety?
21) Were you wearing panty hose?
22) If you were wearing panty hose, were they full or half?
23) Did you have on a low-cut top?
24) Do you think Mr. Cain is a boob man?
25) Did he attempt to fondle your breasts?
26) As most men are so fascinated by breasts, did it not strike you as odd that he bypassed them and rather first reached for your genitals?
26) Most women share information like this with girl friends. Did you and if not, why?
27) The transcript of your remarks says Mr. Cain’s tie was removed. Who removed it?
28) In your actual remarks, you say his shirt was unbuttoned. Who unbuttoned it?
29) How tall are you and how much did you weigh around that time?
Questions for Mr. Cain
1) Did this dinner happen?
2) If it did not, where were you that night? Were you in Washington?
There is and always has been, a moderate sized undercurrent of integrity and financial responsibility challenged people within our population. The Democratic Party and their captive media have, for the last couple of decades, tapped ever deeper into that questionable resource for darkening/warping/smearing brushes, with which to Photoshop the images of individuals they perceive as serious political threats and who have risen to the top for the moment.
Thus far they have used only women who were supposedly of legal age at the time of their never proven and always late allegations. However, at the cubic rate of growth of the use of this tactic on the left, we may look for the same shaky stories from the same sex and underage at the time, genres also. Especially so considering the current popularity of (experimental?) combinations of both in the media lately against other than political figures and as we witness the devastatingly lethal effects upon both the target and everyone around them.
There seems to be no good legal response to the tactic, since once the target is tried and found guilty in the news media, the usual court remedies are no longer viable, seeming only to create more grit for the media mill and in practice, requiring the victim to prove his innocence rather than the accuser to prove any guilt.
And the really good news for the Democratic operatives? Whatever the final outcome, it will be well after the election in question.