Why paint a narrative that the one item you cannot possess is the one item you need in order to justify your argument?
Because it continues to string along their sheep
Why paint a narrative that the one item you cannot possess is the one item you need in order to justify your argument?
Because when the audience you’re playing to aren’t lawyers, you can exploit that blindspot the same way a ball player mimics being fouled in order to draw the call from officials. Without instant replay from multiple angles, all you have to go on is player’s (dishonest) reaction.
Emotion is convincing unless you think it through and think for yourselves.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/04/mueller-report-attorney-general-grand-jury-information/
Releasing the grand jury material will probably hurt the D’s more than the R’s and will bounce back on them the way the Mueller testimony bounced back on the D’s this week. But the real hurt will be to the true Americans testifying for what they thought was the good of USA during Mueller CG