Why paint a narrative that the one item you cannot possess is the one item you need in order to justify your argument?

Because it continues to string along their sheep

Screen Shot 2019-07-26 at 2.03.06 PM.png

Screen Shot 2019-07-26 at 2.02.51 PM.png

Why paint a narrative that the one item you cannot possess is the one item you need in order to justify your argument?

Because when the audience you’re playing to aren’t lawyers, you can exploit that blindspot the same way a ball player mimics being fouled in order to draw the call from officials. Without instant replay from multiple angles, all you have to go on is player’s (dishonest) reaction.

Emotion is convincing unless you think it through and think for yourselves.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/04/mueller-report-attorney-general-grand-jury-information/