Mine is.

Former President Donald Trump is amending his lawsuit against Big Tech companies Facebook, Twitter and Google to include some of the 65,000 censorship stories submitted by American citizens.

According to the America First Policy Institute, the lawsuit, filed July 7, is adding ”additional censorship experiences” from 65,000 citizens that sent their stories into the institute’s website.

”Late last night, Amended Complaints were filed in the Big Tech lawsuits against Facebook, Inc., Mark Zuckerberg, Twitter, Inc., Jack Dorsey, Google LLC, and Sundar Pichai. Since the initial filing on July 7, 2021, nearly 65,000 American people have submitted their stories of censorship through America First Policy Institute’s (AFPI) Constitutional Litigation Partnership (CLP) at TakeOnBigTech.com,” an announcement on the site reported Wednesday.

”The Amended Complaints include additional censorship experiences and incorporates additional class representatives, including Dr. Naomi Wolf and Wayne Allyn Root — individuals on opposite ends of the political spectrum who highlight the bipartisan need to protect the thoughts and voices of all Americans, regardless of political affiliation.”

Trump’s class action suit alleges the social media giants violated his First Amendment rights by suspending his accounts while he was the sitting president, and charges that they are now ”state actors” by collaborating with the federal government on what information is ”misinformation,” and subject to censorship, The Washington Post reported July 8.

”We’re demanding an end to the ‘shadow-banning,’ a stop to the silencing, and a stop to the blacklisting, banishing and canceling that you know so well,” Trump said during a press conference announcing the lawsuit.

The suit also seeks to end Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects the social media platforms from litigation that can be brought against other publishers in traditional media.

Critics were quick to dismiss Trump’s chances at emerging from the suit victorious.

”There’s no way a plaintiff has been able to get traction in the past, and there’s no way that Trump is going to be able to get traction either,” Eric Goldman, a professor at Santa Clara University Law School in California, said in the Post article.

Trump’s claims that the companies were ”working directly with government actors to censor free speech” may have been validated recently by the administration of President Joe Biden when White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said during a recent press briefingthat the federal government was collaborating with the companies to ”flag misinformation” on the COVID pandemic.

”I would say first, it shouldn’t come as any surprise that we’re in regular touch with social media platforms — just like we’re in regular touch with all of you and your media outlets — about areas where we have concern, information that might be useful, information that may or may not be interesting to your viewers,” Psaki said during her July 16 press briefing. ”You all make decisions, just like the social media platforms make decisions, even though they’re a private-sector company and different, but just as an example.”

She also said that anyone promoting what they consider ”misinformation” should not be banned from just that one platform, but from all platforms.

”A couple of the steps that we have — you know, that could be constructive for the public health of the country are providing for — for Facebook or other platforms to measure and publicly share the impact of misinformation on their platform and the audience it’s reaching, also with the public, with all of you to create robust enforcement strategies that bridge their properties and provide transparency about rules,” she said. ”You shouldn’t be banned from one platform and not others if you — for providing misinformation out there.”