Patel Patriot – Addendum Series

NOTE: The conclusion that Patel Patriot offers is one I’ve long suspected. The first clue I had was the fact that Lindell had the packets – the PCAPS. My question then as now: HOW did he obtain them? We know from Q’s clues that the military IT specialists were watching and capturing a record of the votes coming in on the internet and being swapped out in real time. It is even said by some that President Trump (and attorney Sidney Powell) spent time in the SCIF watching the votes come from outside of our country — again, in REAL TIME.

I believe Patel Patriot has figured it out. Read this and tell us what you think.

Andrea

🔥 Devolution – Addendum Series Part 3 – Durham & Lindell 🔥

https://patelpatriot.substack.com/p/devolution-addendum-series-part-3

This article is much shorter than my normal article but there is an interesting theory you need to check out that relates to both Durham and Lindell.

I want to preface this article by saying that I will be speculating quite a bit more than I usually do. That is what my addendum series is about. I try to hypothesize based on the available information. The amount of circumstantial evidence pointing to devolution happening right now is undeniable, but the most difficult aspect to figure out is how it will unfold and get Trump back in office. Piecing together the final stages of the devolution plan requires some speculation.

In this addendum I’m going to discuss two figures that I haven’t yet spent any time on, but have been taking center stage as of late. One of them we know has been working behind the scenes for years, but the other is just about to make his mark. These two individuals are John Durham and Mike Lindell. I don’t consider myself an expert on the Spygate investigation, so I won’t be discussing that in detail therefore most of this article will discuss Mike and where he might fit in to the plan. However, there is a theory that has piqued my interest and I believe it is worth discussing because it connects both Durham and Lindell.

Exhausting All Options

Initial Thoughts

Keep in mind that Devolution is a contingency plan. I believe everything is in place and ready for the military to step in and make moves- if and when necessary- to place Trump back in office, but what if that never needs to happen with military involvement? I’ve said before that Donald Trump has a reverence for our founding fathers and always seeks to uphold the United States Constitution. If there are legitimate and constitutional options to overturn the 2020 election, I believe it’s safe to say that Trump will exhaust those options before pulling the trigger and getting the military involved. 

This is where both the State Legislatures and Mike Lindell come into play. State Legislatures decertifying their electors for Biden would be legal, even if unprecedented. And it’s certainly interesting that all of the sudden, there have recently been multiple stories coming out on this front:

• State representative Tim Ramthun moves to decertify the 2020 election in Wisconsin
• AZ Attorney General Mark Brnovich investigates the 2020 election
• Georgia governor Brian Kemp orders probe into “sloppy” November 2020 vote counts in Fulton County
• Stunning election fraud found in Delaware County Pennsylvania

At the same time an abundance of these stories seem to be making their way to the headlines, Mike Lindell will be taking a case to the Supreme Court of the United States in an attempt to fix the 2020 election. What Mike Lindell is doing is also quite legal, but before we dig into his lawsuit, I think we should take a look at how we got here first.

Mike Lindell

Leading up to Mike Lindell’s cyber symposium back in August I was getting many comments and questions about whether I thought he would be the one to kick off the reveal of devolution. I was extremely skeptical because at the time I couldn’t logically figure out a reason as to why Mike would be part of the plan. I didn’t think his symposium would reveal anything, and when it ended I felt like I was correct and justified in my thought process.

I’m starting to wonder if there is something much larger at play with Mike. Let’s look at a brief timeline of Mike’s involvement with rectifying the 2020 election starting from after the electoral college vote on January 6th:

• January 15th, 2021 – Mike Lindell reportedly meets with President Trump at the White House.
  • This story is interesting because Washington Post photographer Jabin Botsford was able to get a good picture of the notes that Mike was holding in his hand. She stated in her tweet that her picture was taken before the meeting, implying the notes were what Lindell was bringing to the meeting. The notes are certainly interesting as they mention martial law, foreign interference by China/Iran, and triggering emergency powers. Mike Lindell claimed he didn’t even read the notes but instead was just passing them along from lawyers he knows. What I find most interesting about the meeting Mike Lindell had with Trump is that he claimed Robert O’Brien was also present at the meeting. If you don’t see the significance of that, please go back and read Devolution – Part 13:

• February 22nd, 2021 – Dominion Voting Systems sued Mike Lindell

Dominion Voting Systems sued both MyPillow and Lindell, seeking damages of more than $1.3 billion. In weeks prior, the company had said Lindell was “begging to be sued.” MyPillow, has since launched a counter-lawsuit against Dominion for $1.6 billion.

• June 12th, 2021 – Mike Lindell claims “that sometime during the month of July, 2021, a case based on a ‘writ of quo warranto’ will be brought directly in the U.S. Supreme Court which will result in a 9-0 decision overturning the 2020 general election and reinstalling President Trump into office.”
• June 14th, 2021 – Mike Lindell announces Cyber Symposium
• July 11th, 2021 – Mike Lindell reportedly met with Donald Trump before Trump’s CPAC Speech

• August 10-12th, 2021- Mike Lindell hosts the Cyber Symposium
  • The symposium left many disappointed and underwhelmed. Here is what Patrick Byrne had to say:

• August 13th, 2021 – Mike Lindell met with Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago
• September 21, 2021 – Mike Lindell announces he will take his case to SCOTUS before thanksgiving (November 23rd).
• November 17th, 2021 – Mike Lindell releases recorded interview with Donald Trump

That brings us to where we are now, once again waiting to see if what Mike Lindell is claiming will turn out to be credible or not. When I look at the timeline of Mike Lindell there is one thing that really sticks out to me. He has been meeting with Donald Trump in private and has done so mulitple times since the first private meeting was reported on January 15th, 2021. Those are just meetings we know about. In the interview Trump did with Mike, Trump all but gave his endorsement of what Mike Lindell is doing with his upcoming date with SCOTUS. 

This leads me to believe that there really might be something larger at play here. Why hasn’t Trump distanced himself from Mike Lindell, but instead has agreed to do an interview with him just prior to the case going before the Supreme Court?

Before I give my analysis on what I actually think is happening, let’s try to get a better understanding of the case Mike Lindell is bringing before SCOTUS.

Quo Warranto

I feel the need to mention here, before digging into this section, that I have no legal background. I have researched this topic extensively and feel like I have a good understanding so I am going to outline my thoughts the best I can. Let’s start with the definition of quo warranto as defined by Cornell’s Legal Information Institute:

There has been a quo warranto lawsuit filed against a sitting president before. On January 20th, 2009, a quo warranto lawsuit was filed against Barack Obama claiming he was constitutionally ineligible to be the President of the United States.

Here is a summary from an opinion of the case:

Essentially, the case was dismissed for multiple reasons but the one I’d like to focus on is the “lack of standing.” Here are the 6 different categories of plaintiffs in the case: Active military personnel, former military personnel, state representatives, federal taxpayers, relatives of Obama, and political candidates. Here is what the courts said in regards to proper standing:

The court ruled that each of the 6 categories of plaintiffs failed to establish standing, that includes state representatives as well as the political candidates, who were on the presidential ballot in California. Feel free to read through the case for more details, but each one was shot down with seemingly justifiable reasoning and according to proper precedent.

I’m concerned by this because if there is already precedent for dismissing a suit even with state representatives listed as plaintiffs, will Mike Lindell’s quo warranto case also be shot down for similar reasons? Having the AGs from multiple states on board is important, and I’ll explain why shortly, but there was a pre-inauguration case with multiple state AGs on board that was shot down due to lack of standing. Will this case suffer the same fate? I have to imagine that they have thought this through and whoever is signed on to the case would have an argument for legal standing, but we will just have to wait and see how it unfolds.

When I look at the legal definition of establishing standing and how it relates to the case Mike Lindell is bringing before SCOTUS, there is one part that sticks out: “traceable to the challenged action of the defendant, and not the result of the independent action of some third party not before the court.” Does this mean the PCAP data would be irrelevant? Do they have to specifically show Biden and his campaign were directly involved in the theft of the election? Do they have that specific evidence? 

However they decide the standing, and whether or not they even allow the evidence, I’m not even sure it matters. 

Let’s discuss what does matter.

Part of the Plan?

In order for Mike Lindell’s case to be effective (whether it succeeds or not) there are two requirements (in my opinion):

• Mike has to have the evidence he claims to have. 
  • There is plenty of evidence of voter fraud out there. We have seen numerous examples and even more has come out over the past few weeks (think of the videos from Delaware County, PA). What I am referring to here is the PCAP data which proves foreign interference. I will touch on this again later, but Mike needs to have that evidence and it needs to be solid and irrefutable.
• There has to be multiple states’ Attorney Generals signed on to the case.
  • If there are AGs on board with this case, it means they looked at the evidence Mike has brought forth and found it not only credible, but solid enough to make for a winning case.

If the above two requirements are met, and bearing in mind that what Mike Lindell is doing seemingly has the endorsement of Donald Trump, then I believe this could be a step in the direction of Trump’s return. 

Allow me to explain.

There are really only three possible outcomes that I can see resulting from the case Mike Lindell is sponsoring and bringing before the Supreme Court:

1. SCOTUS votes to look at the evidence(A) They look at all the evidence and decide to grant the Quo Warranto and overturn the results of the 2020 election.(B) They look at all the evidence and decide NOT to grant the Quo Warranto and it would appear we remain stuck with Joe Biden
2. SCOTUS votes NOT to look at the evidence of the case, and it would appear we remain stuck with Joe Biden

For obvious reasons, 1 (A) would be preferred. This route would be completely legal and constitutional and is a legitimate path for Trump to return to the White House. Whether or not Joe Biden and his administration would abide by this ruling is another topic of discussion. If I’m being completely honest, I see this outcome as least likely but I would happily be proven wrong here.

The remaining two outcomes is where things could get interesting. Again, this all comes down to the evidence being brought forth and requires that there are actually AGs signed on to this lawsuit. If the evidence is what Mike Lindell claims it is, and AGs have signed on, then both outcomes 1 (B) and 2 would result in the United States reaching a full blown constitutional crisis. 

Think back to Devolution – Part 13 where I listed the NEFs which we found in Federal Continuity Directive – 2. Remember that the NEFs “must be supported through COOP and COG capabilities.” The very first NEF listed is this:

The court ruled that each of the 6 categories of plaintiffs failed to establish standing, that includes state representatives as well as the political candidates, who were on the presidential ballot in California. Feel free to read through the case for more details, but each one was shot down with seemingly justifiable reasoning and according to proper precedent.

I’m concerned by this because if there is already precedent for dismissing a suit even with state representatives listed as plaintiffs, will Mike Lindell’s quo warranto case also be shot down for similar reasons? Having the AGs from multiple states on board is important, and I’ll explain why shortly, but there was a pre-inauguration case with multiple state AGs on board that was shot down due to lack of standing. Will this case suffer the same fate? I have to imagine that they have thought this through and whoever is signed on to the case would have an argument for legal standing, but we will just have to wait and see how it unfolds.

When I look at the legal definition of establishing standing and how it relates to the case Mike Lindell is bringing before SCOTUS, there is one part that sticks out: “traceable to the challenged action of the defendant, and not the result of the independent action of some third party not before the court.” Does this mean the PCAP data would be irrelevant? Do they have to specifically show Biden and his campaign were directly involved in the theft of the election? Do they have that specific evidence? 

However they decide the standing, and whether or not they even allow the evidence, I’m not even sure it matters. 

Let’s discuss what does matter.

Part of the Plan?

In order for Mike Lindell’s case to be effective (whether it succeeds or not) there are two requirements (in my opinion):

• Mike has to have the evidence he claims to have. 
  • There is plenty of evidence of voter fraud out there. We have seen numerous examples and even more has come out over the past few weeks (think of the videos from Delaware County, PA). What I am referring to here is the PCAP data which proves foreign interference. I will touch on this again later, but Mike needs to have that evidence and it needs to be solid and irrefutable.
• There has to be multiple states’ Attorney Generals signed on to the case.
  • If there are AGs on board with this case, it means they looked at the evidence Mike has brought forth and found it not only credible, but solid enough to make for a winning case.

If the above two requirements are met, and bearing in mind that what Mike Lindell is doing seemingly has the endorsement of Donald Trump, then I believe this could be a step in the direction of Trump’s return. 

Allow me to explain.

There are really only three possible outcomes that I can see resulting from the case Mike Lindell is sponsoring and bringing before the Supreme Court:

1. SCOTUS votes to look at the evidence(A) They look at all the evidence and decide to grant the Quo Warranto and overturn the results of the 2020 election.(B) They look at all the evidence and decide NOT to grant the Quo Warranto and it would appear we remain stuck with Joe Biden
2. SCOTUS votes NOT to look at the evidence of the case, and it would appear we remain stuck with Joe Biden

For obvious reasons, 1 (A) would be preferred. This route would be completely legal and constitutional and is a legitimate path for Trump to return to the White House. Whether or not Joe Biden and his administration would abide by this ruling is another topic of discussion. If I’m being completely honest, I see this outcome as least likely but I would happily be proven wrong here.

The remaining two outcomes is where things could get interesting. Again, this all comes down to the evidence being brought forth and requires that there are actually AGs signed on to this lawsuit. If the evidence is what Mike Lindell claims it is, and AGs have signed on, then both outcomes 1 (B) and 2 would result in the United States reaching a full blown constitutional crisis. 

Think back to Devolution – Part 13 where I listed the NEFs which we found in Federal Continuity Directive – 2. Remember that the NEFs “must be supported through COOP and COG capabilities.” The very first NEF listed is this:

The Strategy discussed in Devolution – Part 13 allows those running the devolution operation the ability to re-prioritize the NEFs as needed, but this is still an important one and likely still right at the top. When operating as intended, our Constitutional form of government is what sets America apart from every other nation on Earth. We are the last remaining beacon of freedom. Maintaining this specific NEF means we can’t allow stolen elections to stand and if we do, it means we have lost that freedom.

That is when the military would come into play. Here is the military oath of enlistment:

If the evidence Mike Lindell claims to have is genuine, then we have already seen the failure of both the legislative and executive branches of our government due to rampant election fraud. Many members of congress are illegitimate just like the current “president” occupying the White House. That means on January 6th, an illegitimate congress rubber-stamped an illegitimate president resulting in the failure of both those branches.

If the only remaining branch of government (judicial) fails to recognize and rectify the 2020 election and illegitimacy of the other two branches, then all three branches of government would no longer be functioning as intended. Our form of government under the United States Constitution would no longer exist; a genuine constitutional crisis. I believe reaching this point would move us another step closer to the reveal of Devolution. We first have to exhaust all available legal and constitutional methods before military involvement is warranted. I truly believe this is how it will play out and here is my reasoning.

If the evidence Mike has is genuine, he could have went to the same AGs much sooner and got them on board. He could have taken his information to SCOTUS much sooner as he intended to after his August symposium. He could have even taken it to SCOTUS on January 21st. Why didn’t he? 

It comes down to the timing. 

As I have been saying since day 1 of my series, in order for Trump to return, there needs to be a super majority of Americans ready and willing to accept his return. The fact this has been pushed back until now when it didn’t need to be tells me it was done so on purpose. It has been timed to coincide with the multitude of failures of Biden’s administration and the mass awakening of Americans that has resulted from those highly visible failures. 

So once again, if Mike Lindell has the AGs on board as he claims, and the evidence he possesses is genuine, than this upcoming SCOTUS date is even bigger than we realize. 

There is a great podcast from Chris Paul on why we can’t right (sic) off Mike Lindell’s court case and you should listen to it if you have the time: https://rumble.com/vouwox-dont-sleep-on-the-pillow-mans-case.html

There is one thing about his evidence that I would like to discuss before moving on because it serves as a great precursor to my final thought for this article. On August 6th, 2021, the Gateway Pundit posted an article discussing that an expert cyber team was able prove that votes could be altered from overseas. Here is the part I found most interesting:

Keep the chain of custody in mind as we continue.

Questions & Answers

Questions

This last section will have to do with both Mike Lindell and John Durham. Before laying out the theory I’m going to ask a series of questions which only this theory seems to properly answer. 

Regarding Mike Lindell:

• If his PCAPs are genuine, where did he get them?
• If his PCAPs are genuine, why is he allowed to maintain possession of them?
• If his PCAPs are genuine, how is he able to maintain the proper chain of custody necessary to prove they are genuine without a doubt?

Regarding John Durham:

• Why hasn’t the Biden administration shut him down yet?

That is really the only question about Durham that I have, and the only one, in my opinion, that is needed. As I have said numerous times, the theft of the 2020 election was a culmination of the political establishment’s efforts to cover up for Spygate. Everything they did throughout President Trump’s first term was to cover up for their Russia Hoax. The Mueller special counsel, the impeachment, the lies, the election theft. Everything was aimed at removing Trump so that the crimes we see coming from the Durham special counsel would never see the light of day.

I know people say “well he’s a special counsel and they can’t, it’s the precedent they set when Trump couldn’t fire Mueller”… “It’s not legal for them to shut down a special counsel.” They stole a freakin’ election but haven’t shut down John Durham because of legality or optics? They don’t care about either of those things and they never have. Both Obama’s time in office as well as Joe Biden’s entire “presidency” has shown us that.

The conspiracy case that John Durham is showing us with these “speaking indictments” clearly shows the highest levels of the Obama administration were involved in this, including Joe Biden and Obama himself. Multiple agencies from our intelligence community are also complicit. If they truly had any control whatsoever, they would do absolutely anything they could to shut John Durham down, which is my entire point. They clearly don’t have control over John Durham. Why?

This is where I’ll present the theory. I’m not saying this is fact. I’m saying it’s possible and it would make sense when you look at the big picture. 

Answers

Are John Durham and Mike Lindell operating under the auspices of the military?

More specifically, is it possible they have been Direct Commissioned into our military while carrying out their roles? Here is what I mean:

Here is what Wikipedia has relating to DCOs:

Civilians can be direct-commissioned into the military when their skills are critical to sustaining military operations. This is common within the military and would be easy to do under the radar. If Mike Lindell and John Durham are actually working as military direct commissioned officers, then it would answer all of the questions.

Regarding Mike Lindell:

• If his PCAPs are genuine, where did he get them? 
  • From the military.
• If his PCAPs are genuine, why is he allowed to maintain possession of them? 
  • He is working with and under the protection of the military.
• If his PCAPs are genuine, how is he able to maintain the chain of custody necessary to prove they are genuine without a doubt?
  • If any group could prove proper chain of custody it’s the military.

Regarding John Durham:

• Why hasn’t the Biden administration shut him down yet?
  • Because he isn’t working with the DOJ, he’s working with the military.

Closing

As we discovered in Devolution – Part 13, the scope of the devolution plan is much larger than we first realized. 

If the same people who will be taken down by John Durham also played a role in the theft of the 2020 election, wouldn’t it make sense for the devolution plan to account for John Durham’s investigation and provide an avenue for it to continue uninterrupted? Commissioning him to the military during a devolution operation would truly move him out of their reach. 

If Trump and his team are to exhaust all legal and constitutional methods of rectifying the 2020 election, they need to go before SCOTUS with irrefutable and concrete evidence. Maybe Mike Lindell is the guy to bring that evidence forth. If he is to truly move the chess pieces forward, his evidence has to be solid and irrefutable. Working with the military would be as solid as it gets.

Trump set out to drain the swamp and give the government back to We the People. In order to do that, everything needs to be exposed. That includes exposing the failures of all three branches of government. We are about to find out whether or not we have truly reached a full-blown constitutional crisis.

Any way you look at it, the next few weeks should be extremely interesting. As I’ve stated already, I would be happy to be wrong in this situation, but I don’t think SCOTUS will overturn the election. But that doesn’t mean we won’t be one step closer to Trump’s return. 

THE BEST IS YET TO COME

Patel Patriot

https://t.me/patelpatriot

EVEN IF YOU ARE ALREADY ON MY EMAIL LIST – You can support my work by subscribing to this newsletter for $10 per month or $75 per year! Your support has been truly inspirational!

Just click this link:

Support Patel Patriot

Locals Link: patelpatriot.locals.com

Venmo Link: @patelpatriot

PS: I don’t have a way to contact you individually but I want to say THANK YOU to those who have contributed to the “Tip Jar”. Means more to me than you will ever know. Thank you much!

God Bless you all!

3