- Just so you know …
- Sam Bankman-Fried didn’t really pay a $250 million dollar bail – he paid nothing, his parents put up a $4 million dollar home, and he walked.
- Everything they tell you is always a lie.
- Crime pays for those who pay corrupt politicians.
- Yesterday, after setting bail for SBF and two of his accomplices, the judge in the case recused herself.
- Do you think this conflict had anything to do with SBF’s low bail? Do you think she should have recused herself before setting bail?
- Crime pays if you pay politicians.
Source: thegatewaypundit.com
Dear Readers ~
UNDERSTAND THIS: The instrument that was carelessly used to ‘release’ (aka free) little spoiled brat Sammy was a BOND. A BOND is NOT ‘bail’. The two instruments are clearly and distinctly different.
A BOND supposedly is granted after a/some material object(s) are offered as collateral to insure an alleged law-breaker meets restrictions until their legal process is completed. SBFs’ parents supposedly put their measly $4M home up as collateral. Not even close to the amount of money stolen by SBF.
BAIL is where an *actual* amount of money is offered to insure an alleged law-breaker meets restrictions until their legal process is completed. It is usually set at a predetermined percentage set by guidelines recommended for the courts. IE SBFs’ bail should have been somewhere in the amount of $1B.
This clown show just keeps getting better and better.