“This is an excellent rebuttal to the claims and story in Hersch’s substack. Very much worth reading and considering.” – Kyle (Just Human)
OSINT & Analysis by Oliver Alexander
On the surface Seymour Hersh’s story looks passable, but as you dig deeper it has more holes than the Nord Stream pipeline.
“Seymour Hersh’s recent Substack post claims to provide a highly detailed account of a covert US operation to destroy the Nord Stream pipelines in order to ensure that Russia would be unable to supply Germany with natural gas through them. All the information in Hersh’s post reportedly comes from a single unnamed source, who appears to have had direct access to every step of the planning and execution of this highly secretive operation.
When first reading through Hersh’s account of the events, the level of detail he provides could add credence to his story. Unfortunately for Hersh’s story, the high level of detail is also where the entire story begins to unravel and fall apart. It is often stated that people who lie have a tendency to add too much superfluous detail to their accounts. This attempt to “cover all bases” is in many cases what trips these people up. Extra details add extra points of reference that can be crosschecked and examined. In Hersh’s case, this is exactly what appears to have happened.”
https://oalexanderdk.substack.com/p/blowing-holes-in-seymour-hershs-pipe
Now this:
A rebuttal of the rebuttal.
A rebuttal to Seymour Hersh’s reporting on the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines.
Be sure to have a look at the comment by Bruce Wolman.
— Kyle (Just Human) 👇👇👇
