Very lengthy but LOADED with facts/theories about Snowden, Assange and others.

I have postulated the roles of Edward Snowden and Julian Assange are part of a broader strategy to expose government malfeasance and corruption. Their actions are part of a coordinated “White Hat” operation led by Trump and the Patriots aimed at bringing to light the hidden machinations of global elites and institutions. This article explores this theory in detail, examining the significant disclosures made by Snowden and Assange, their roles in “The Plan,” and the current implications of their actions on global politics and public awareness.
The Foundations – Snowden and Assange
Edward Snowden’s Revelations
In 2013, Edward Snowden, a former contractor for the National Security Agency (NSA), disclosed a trove of classified documents revealing extensive global surveillance programs. These programs, run by the NSA and its Five Eyes partners (Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States), operated with the cooperation of telecommunication companies and European governments. Snowden’s leaks highlighted the scale and scope of government surveillance, sparking a global debate on national security, individual privacy, and civil liberties.
Snowden’s revelations came during the Obama administration, a period marked by the administration’s claims of transparency and accountability. However, Snowden’s disclosures painted a different picture, exposing significant abuses of power and a lack of oversight in the surveillance activities of the U.S. government.
Edward Snowden’s Revelations
Key Revelations from Snowden:
- PRISM Program: One of the most significant revelations was the PRISM program, which allowed the NSA to collect internet communications from major tech companies such as Google, Facebook, Microsoft, and Apple. This program enabled the agency to access emails, chat logs, and other data directly from company servers without individual warrants.
- Upstream Collection: Snowden revealed that the NSA had direct access to fiber-optic cables that carry global internet traffic. This “upstream collection” allowed the NSA to intercept and store vast amounts of communication data, including emails, voice calls, and other internet activities. Imagine the Epstein Island and P Diddy properties phone capture data.
- XKeyscore: This tool enabled the NSA to search and analyze global internet data in real-time. Snowden’s disclosures showed that XKeyscore could be used to track individuals’ online activities, including their browsing history, emails, and social media interactions, without needing a warrant.
- Boundless Informant: This NSA tool was used to map and analyze the data collected worldwide. It provided an overview of the extent of surveillance operations, showing the sheer volume of metadata and content being intercepted from various countries.
- Mass Metadata Collection: Snowden revealed that the NSA was collecting metadata on millions of phone calls made by Americans. This metadata included the numbers dialed, call durations, and the locations of the callers, raising concerns about the erosion of privacy and civil liberties.
- Surveillance of World Leaders: Documents disclosed by Snowden showed that the NSA had monitored the communications of world leaders, including German Chancellor Angela Merkel. This revelation strained diplomatic relations and highlighted the global reach of NSA surveillance.
- Collaboration with Other Agencies: Snowden’s leaks also revealed that the NSA was collaborating with other intelligence agencies, such as the UK’s GCHQ, to conduct mass surveillance. These collaborations involved sharing data and technologies, expanding the scope of surveillance operations.
- FISA Court Abuses: Snowden’s revelations shed light on the secretive operations of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA Court), which was established to oversee requests for surveillance warrants against foreign spies inside the United States. Snowden revealed that the FISA Court had been approving broad and sweeping surveillance measures without sufficient oversight, effectively rubber-stamping requests from intelligence agencies. This lack of accountability and transparency raised serious concerns about the erosion of civil liberties and the potential for abuse of power.
Julian Assange and the DNC Leaks
Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, has been a controversial figure in the realm of whistleblowing and information freedom. His platform gained significant attention for publishing classified documents from various governments and organizations. One of the most notable instances was the release of emails from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) in 2016, which occurred during the Trump administration. These leaks are seen by many as part of a broader strategy executed by Trump and his allies to expose deep-seated corruption.
Julian Assange and the DNC Leaks
Key Revelations from Assange:
- DNC Emails: The emails leaked by WikiLeaks, in two phases (the first on July 22, 2016, and the second on November 6, 2016), revealed internal communications within the DNC. These emails exposed the DNC’s bias against Bernie Sanders and their efforts to support Hillary Clinton’s campaign during the Democratic primaries. They showed how the DNC had strategized to undermine Sanders, which led to significant controversy and allegations of a rigged primary process.
- Podesta Emails: In October 2016, WikiLeaks began releasing emails from John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman. These emails provided a glimpse into the inner workings of the Clinton campaign, including discussions on campaign strategies, media relations, and interactions with key political figures. The emails also highlighted concerns about Clinton’s private email server and other controversial issues.
- Hillary Clinton’s Speeches: The leaks included excerpts from Hillary Clinton’s paid speeches to Wall Street banks and other organizations. These excerpts revealed Clinton’s close ties with financial institutions and her private stance on various issues, which often contrasted with her public positions. The revelations fueled criticism of Clinton’s perceived favoritism toward Wall Street and her lack of transparency.
- Clinton Foundation: Some of the leaked emails shed light on the operations of the Clinton Foundation, raising questions about potential conflicts of interest and the influence of wealthy donors on Clinton’s political decisions. The emails suggested that donors to the foundation may have received special access and favors from Clinton during her tenure as Secretary of State.
- Pizzagate: The Podesta emails also included references that, once decoded, pointed to an elaborate child trafficking ring involving high-profile political figures and a Washington, D.C. pizzeria called Comet Ping Pong. Investigations and leaked documents have substantiated these claims, revealing a network of elite individuals involved in heinous activities.
- Seth Rich: The controversy surrounding the leaks intensified with the murder of Seth Rich, a DNC staffer. Speculation arose that Rich was the source of the leaked emails and that his death was linked to the leaks. Although these claims remain unproven, the case added a layer of intrigue and conspiracy to the narrative.
His name was Seth Rich
The Broader Context: The Plan
The actions of Snowden and Assange are not isolated incidents but part of a pre-existing plan to expose deep-seated corruption and criminal activity within various global institutions. This plan, often referred to as “The Plan,” involves a series of strategic disclosures aimed at dismantling the power structures of global elites, led by Trump and the Patriots.
Key Elements of the Exposure
- Weaponization of Government: Disclosures have highlighted how government agencies have been used to target political opponents and suppress dissent. This includes the weaponization of the FBI and DOJ, where investigations and legal actions have been politically motivated, impacting individuals and groups opposed to certain political agendas.
- Election Fraud: Evidence has surfaced suggesting manipulation and fraud in electoral processes, raising questions about the legitimacy of democratic institutions. The 2020 Presidential Election has been a focal point, with claims of irregularities and fraud being investigated in multiple states.
- Pizzagate: Ongoing investigations and leaks have continued to draw attention to allegations of elite involvement in child trafficking and exploitation. High-profile figures in politics, entertainment, and business have been implicated, fueling public outrage and demands for accountability.
- Bioweapons and Vaccines: The COVID-19 pandemic has brought to light concerns about the origins of the virus and the safety and efficacy of vaccines. Whistleblowers and investigative journalists have raised alarms about potential conflicts of interest, rushed vaccine approvals, and the suppression of alternative treatments.
- Mass Criminal Entanglement: A growing body of evidence suggests widespread corruption involving governments, the judicial system, intelligence agencies (CIA/DOJ/FBI), media, Hollywood, political figures, corporations, and globalist organizations (WEF, WHO, NATO, UN). The interconnections between these entities create a complex web of influence and control.
Additional Connections and Details Epstein and Maxwell: The arrests of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell have brought renewed attention to the issue of elite child trafficking networks. Epstein’s death and Maxwell’s trial have uncovered connections to powerful individuals across various sectors, adding credibility to allegations of widespread abuse and cover-ups. The Epstein Island flight logs revealed a list of high-profile individuals who visited Epstein’s private island, further substantiating claims of a vast network of exploitation and blackmail. Notable individuals implicated include: Prince Andrew: The Duke of York faced allegations of sexual misconduct tied to his association with Epstein and Maxwell, further supported by photographic evidence and testimonies from victims. Bill Clinton: The former president’s numerous flights on Epstein’s private jet, nicknamed the “Lolita Express,” and visits to Epstein’s island have raised questions about his involvement or knowledge of the activities there. Alan Dershowitz: The high-profile attorney has been accused of participating in Epstein’s sex trafficking operations, though he has denied these allegations.
- Hunter Biden’s Laptops: The discovery of Hunter Biden’s laptops has revealed potentially incriminating information involving his business dealings and personal conduct. This has raised questions about corruption and influence-peddling at the highest levels of government. The laptops contained emails suggesting that Hunter Biden leveraged his father, Joe Biden’s, political influence for financial gain, particularly in dealings with Ukrainian and Chinese entities. Moreover, the contents of the laptops reportedly include: Emails and Documents: Communications detailing business dealings and potential pay-to-play schemes involving foreign entities. Graphic Videos and Photos: Disturbing media depicting drug use and explicit activities, raising concerns about potential blackmail and national security risks. Sensitive Communications: Text messages and emails that suggest potential misuse of power and influence for personal gain.
The non-profit research group Marco Polo released an extensive report based on the contents of Hunter Biden’s laptops. The report detailed various criminal activities, including:
- Drug Use and Prostitution: Numerous instances of drug use and interactions with sex workers.
- Illicit Business Transactions: Emails and documents outlining potential money laundering and other illicit financial activities.
- Tax Evasion: Evidence suggesting efforts to evade taxes on substantial sums of money earned from foreign business dealings.
- The Durham Investigation: Special Counsel John Durham’s investigation into the origins of the Trump-Russia probe has uncovered misconduct and potential criminal activity within the FBI and DOJ. The findings suggest that the investigation into Trump’s campaign was politically motivated and lacked proper legal basis. Key figures implicated include: James Comey: The former FBI Director has been criticized for his role in the handling of the Trump-Russia investigation and alleged biases. Andrew McCabe: The former Deputy Director of the FBI faced scrutiny over his involvement in the investigation and subsequent leaks to the media. Peter Strzok and Lisa Page: Text messages between the FBI agent and lawyer revealed biases and potential efforts to undermine Trump’s presidency.
- The Twitter Files: Leaks from within Twitter have shown how the platform was used to suppress information and manipulate public opinion. Internal documents reveal coordinated efforts to censor content and silence dissenting voices, often in alignment with government directives. Key revelations from the Twitter Files include: Shadow Banning: Documents revealed that Twitter engaged in shadow banning, limiting the visibility of users’ posts without their knowledge. This practice disproportionately targeted conservative voices and dissenting opinions on various topics, including COVID-19, election integrity, and political scandals. Coordination with Government Agencies: Emails and meeting notes indicated that Twitter executives had regular interactions with officials from the FBI, DHS, and other government agencies. These communications often involved requests to remove or suppress specific tweets or accounts deemed problematic by the government. Censorship of Hunter Biden Laptop Story: The Twitter Files confirmed that Twitter took extraordinary steps to suppress the New York Post’s story about Hunter Biden’s laptops. This included blocking the story’s URL, locking the newspaper’s account, and labeling the information as hacked material, despite evidence to the contrary. Manipulation of Trending Topics: Internal discussions showed that Twitter manually manipulated trending topics to favor certain narratives and suppress others. This practice was used to shape public perception and limit the reach of stories that could harm preferred political agendas. Coordination with NGOs and Activist Groups: Documents revealed that Twitter collaborated with non-governmental organizations and activist groups to flag content and accounts for removal. These groups often had specific political or ideological biases, leading to the disproportionate targeting of conservative and libertarian voices. Deplatforming High-Profile Figures: Internal discussions detailed the decision-making process behind banning high-profile figures, including President Donald Trump. The documents showed that Twitter executives debated the implications of such bans but ultimately proceeded under pressure from both internal and external sources.
- Anthony Weiner’s Laptop: The discovery of Anthony Weiner’s laptop added another layer to the revelations. The laptop, seized during an investigation into Weiner’s inappropriate communications with a minor, reportedly contained a cache of emails belonging to Hillary Clinton, as well as evidence of corruption, pay-to-play schemes, and potentially compromising information on other high-profile individuals. The New York Police Department officers who reviewed the contents described the evidence as “horrifying” and “compelling.” Key figures potentially implicated include: Huma Abedin: Weiner’s estranged wife and a close aide to Hillary Clinton, whose emails were among those discovered on the laptop. The emails suggested that Abedin had significant knowledge of Clinton’s private email server and other sensitive matters. Additionally, Huma Abedin has been linked to the Muslim Brotherhood through her family connections, raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest and security risks. Abedin’s mother, Saleha Abedin, is a prominent member of the Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated organization, the Muslim Sisterhood. Hillary Clinton: The laptop contained a substantial number of Clinton’s emails, raising questions about potential mishandling of classified information and other illegal activities. These emails also linked Clinton to various corrupt dealings and possible cover-ups. John Podesta: The emails included exchanges with John Podesta, further implicating him in the broader network of corruption and highlighting his role in various questionable activities. Clinton Foundation Associates: The laptop provided evidence suggesting that several associates of the Clinton Foundation were involved in pay-to-play schemes, where donations to the foundation were exchanged for political favors and access.
- Hillary and Bill Clinton’s Involvement in Haiti: The Clinton Foundation’s activities in Haiti following the 2010 earthquake have come under intense scrutiny. Bill and Hillary Clinton were heavily involved in the relief efforts, but numerous reports and investigations have raised questions about the management of funds and the foundation’s overall impact. Critically, there have been allegations of missing children and child trafficking connected to the relief efforts. One high-profile case involved Laura Silsby, who was caught attempting to smuggle 33 children out of Haiti. Silsby had connections to the Clintons, raising further suspicions about the foundation’s operations in the country. Monica Petersen: An investigative journalist, Monica Petersen, was found dead in Haiti in 2016 under mysterious circumstances. Petersen had been investigating human trafficking and had reportedly gotten too close to uncovering sensitive information about the Clinton Foundation’s operations in Haiti. Her death has been linked to her investigation into child trafficking and has raised further questions about the Clintons’ involvement.
- Other High-Profile Individuals Implicated: Eric Schmidt: The former CEO of Google has been implicated in using his influence to suppress information and manipulate search engine results to favor certain political narratives. Documents suggest that Schmidt’s involvement in various initiatives extended to supporting efforts to undermine political opponents. George Soros: The billionaire financier has been linked to numerous efforts to influence political outcomes and social movements through his Open Society Foundations. Soros has been accused of funding disruptive protests and campaigns that align with his political goals. John Brennan: The former CIA Director has been implicated in various covert operations and efforts to undermine political opponents. Brennan’s involvement in the Trump-Russia investigation and other intelligence activities has come under scrutiny.
Breaking News: Julian Assange Reaches Plea Deal
In a significant development, Julian Assange has reached a plea deal with US authorities, who have agreed to drop their demand for his extradition from the UK. According to court documents, Assange will plead guilty to Conspiracy to Obtain and Disclose National Defense Information and will be sentenced to time served, amounting to 62 months, the time he has already spent in a British prison. Upon his release, Assange will be free to return to his native Australia.
This plea deal is seen by many as a strategic move within “The Plan,” possibly signaling a broader effort to bring key whistleblowers into the fold of exposing deep-seated corruption. Assange’s potential testimony before Congress could provide critical insights and evidence, furthering the aims of those seeking to dismantle entrenched power structures.
The Role of Tucker Carlson
Tucker Carlson, a prominent media figure, has been instrumental in bringing these issues to the forefront of public discourse. Recently, Carlson interviewed Assange’s wife, Stella Morris, discussing the implications of his legal battles and the broader context of his disclosures. Moreover, Carlson’s recent meetings with Assange have sparked speculation about potential declassification (DECLAS) of sensitive information. Carlson’s efforts are seen as setting the stage for broader public awareness and discussion about government corruption, media manipulation, and corporate malfeasance.
The Current Landscape: Testimony and Accountability
Recent developments suggest that efforts to expose these issues are gaining momentum. There are calls for Snowden and Assange to testify before Congress, providing firsthand accounts and evidence to substantiate their disclosures. This testimony could play a crucial role in ongoing investigations and legislative reforms aimed at addressing the systemic corruption and abuse of power.
The Road Ahead
As the evidence continues to mount, the implications of these revelations are profound. The interconnectedness of government, intelligence agencies, media, and global organizations underscores the complexity of the challenges faced. However, the increasing transparency and public awareness driven by figures like Snowden and Assange offer a glimmer of hope for accountability and reform.
The White Hat operation represents a monumental effort to dismantle entrenched power structures and restore integrity to global institutions. Whether this effort will succeed remains to be seen, but the impact of Snowden and Assange’s actions on the cultural and political landscape is undeniable.
Want to publish your own Article?
48.7K Views

Lots and lots of WOW stuff here. One thing that gets repeated though, which I don’t quite agree with is that these things are / were led or instigated by Trump and his team.
Rather I think that this goes back to intel concerns, specifically military officers who were about ready to conduct a ‘coup’, take military action to remove Obama. Then there’s that video of this guy (no idea who he even was) who spoke about his conversation with military officers who told him what they were very near going to do to save America. And he recommended that they approach Trump to run for President.
So what I’m saying is the way I see it is that ‘it’ was a concern, a plan by some very serious others in highplaces civilian and military INTEL who’d been tracking too. And that Trump was incorporated into it and is now the visible figurehead.
Hey I don’t KNOW. It’s just how I see the progression of things.
I agree with your assessment. It was the military who approached Trump to run, with the guarantee that he would be protected to the extent a human can possibly be. They’re the ones who came up with “the Plan” which Trump is implementing. My opinion based on everything I’ve read and thought through.