Join the discussion at Peak Prosperity: https://peak.fan/mr3j74ps Charlie kirk was shot with a high-velocity rifle round that lodged in his body. However, that shot could not have been taken from Tyler Robinson’s supposed sniper position. Which means Charlie’s killer is probably still out there…
Chris Martenson’s take on Kirk shooting
By Radiopatriot
A former talk radio host turned political activist, diving deep into the intricacies of political warfare and sharing insights on the shadow government and 5th Generation Psy-Ops. RadioPatriot's been diving into political intrigue, from FBI hearings to questioning staged events. Twitter.com/RadioPatriot * Telegram/Radiopatriot * Telegram/Andrea Shea King Gettr/radiopatriot * TRUTHsocial/Radiopatriot
View all of Radiopatriot's posts.
Very very interesting. Compelling. I’m grateful for the explanation about cavitation.
And I noticed something -maybe I’M wrong, maybe I ‘mis-saw’. But the building as shown in Dr Marenson’s drone video shows the building that the alleged shooter was on and supposedly shot from – is seen as a three story edifice. (at the beginning of this video).
At about the 1 hr point and beyond in this video – as seen from the back where we are supposed to believe the person running across the top of the building and dropping to the ground – is running on a two story building.
I looked again at both to double check and hopefully someone else can look.
The only reason in my life experience a building might appear as a two story from one side and a three story from the other side is if there was that severe a ground slope that the lower side allowed for the view of an actual ‘ground’ floor not at all visible from the higher back side.
So there’s that too.
In my 2nd look towards the end of this video – at the two story building our shooter was supposedly climbing down from – appears to be behind the three story building we are supposed to believe the shot came from. (Dr Martenson alludes to the quirkiness of the official story)
From this drone video it’s very hard to determine if there is ground between the 3 story building the shooter was supposedly on top of, and the two story building seen behind it. But again that two story building is quite different in design. So unless the top of the 3 story bldg is fairly level – and very close to the top of the 2 story bldg; and the shooter was on top of the closer 3 story bldg, then he had to have been able to run from front to the back of the 3 story, then onto the top of the 2 story (actually a one story with that small 2nd story structure we can see thru), then hang by hand and drop to the ground.
Anyway I just wanted to share a bit more of the oddities.
Please send that to Chris Martenson at PeakProsperity.com. He is welcoming all comers to help him put the pieces together.
Could be the FBI has information they are not publicly “sharing” because it may involve high-profile individuals/groups who killed Charlie Kirk and they don’t want to “panic” and lose the element of surprise as they are pursuing them?
Alright. one more ‘theory’ presented by Stew Peters. I don’t know who created his presentation but it involves supposedly CK’s personal Islraeli security people, that small lapel mic attached to his shirt, a security guy who ‘triggers’ a detonator in his sleeve which signals that small dark ‘mic’ on Charlie’s shirt to fire a round into his chest/neck and exit. That the shirt billowing out is the energy of the round being fired, etc etc etc. My first question though is where was the kickback? the recoil? Every handgun I’ve fired from .22 to 357 produce recoil. Pistols are heavy and still recoil – such is the energy in fired round: forcing the slug forward while the rearward force/energy forces the weapon backwards. That’s recoil. So in my simple thinking, a small mic gun firing a round (a shell with powder and a slug) would have so much recoil it’d be blown away instead of staying on the shirt.
Check out Chris Martenson for factuals.
https://x.com/chrismartenson
In reference to Episode 2 of the Kirk case:
Please relay to Chris Martenson ,
You’re not seeing the forest for the trees …..
At minute marker 29:00 your comparing the Stairwell Guy and the mug shot of Tyler by comparing the ears.
Don’t look at the ears but the hairline at the back of the neck instead: Tyler’s mug shot reveals the hairline dropping well below the ear, lower almost level with his chin. Whereas, Stairwell Guy’s hairline only drops slightly behind the ear and almost straight back such that the hairline at the back of his neck is much higher than Tyler’s
Additionally, just ask Tyler’s mother;
she’d tell you that Stairwell Guy is not Tyler.
Mothers easily recognize their own …
Hope this is helpful,
Sincerely,
Herb Winkeller
817-236-3033