Obama Didn’t Write His Own Course Syllabus.
Posted by Ann Barnhardt
– March 27, AD 2012 8:20 PM MST
Breitbart.com published Obama’s University of Chicago “Constitutional Law” course syllabus a couple of weeks ago.
Guys, Obama didn’t even write his own syllabus. The prose is sophisticated, the grammar is flawless, and the punctuation is good – heck, there are several semicolons used, and used correctly. In other words, the syllabus is everything that every other sample of genuine Obama-written prose is not. It isn’t the same voice. It isn’t the same author. Period.
Every sample of genuine Obama-written prose in existence is HORRIFIC in terms of prose, grammar and punctuation. Agonizingly horrific. Please see Jack Cashill’s body of work, including several new pieces at AmericanThinker.com .
Look at the course structure itself. Obama only had to bluff his way through four actual class periods, with most of those class periods consisting of student discussion. Students were explicitly graded on their participation in these four class sessions. The other six sessions were “small group project” presentations by the students. Obama wouldn’t have to say or do anything in those class periods except play the part of the “wise professor.” Total scammage.
I think Obama was (and is) so stupid, and such a fraud that he had to have someone else prepare his course for him, including what little bit of lecture he delivered in those four class sessions.
Who might have prepared a course syllabus and light lecture notes on constitutional race issues with an emphasis toward education and race?
Bernardine Dohrn. As in Bill Ayers’ wife.
Bernardine Dohrn was a paralegal at the Chicago law firm of Sidley Austin from 1984-1988, and, as an aside, was very likely acquainted with Michelle Robinson (later Obama) when Michelle summer interned at Sidley Austin while she was in law school and was later hired right out of Harvard Law in 1988. The dates match exactly. Barry was hired as a summer associate by Sidley Austin in 1989 while he was still in law school. That is allegedly how he and Michelle met. Since both Barry and Michelle are affirmative action frauds and put together don’t have the brains God gave a goldfish, neither one lasted long in an actual performance environment, and have only ever held non-performing meaningless crony positions.
The reason Dohrn was a paralegal and not an attorney is only because she was a convicted felon per her terrorism activities with the Weather Underground back in the 1960s and 1970s. Dohrn was fully capable of passing the bar, and was working as a de facto attorney at Sidley Austin, just under the necessary title “paralegal” due to her criminal past.
So, here we have yet another possible connection between Bill Ayers-Bernardine Dohrn and both of the Obamas. But back to the syllabus.
We now know that Bill Ayers’ parents put Obama through Harvard, thanks to Allen Hulton’s testimony. The Ayers also knew that Obama was a lightweight intellectually who needed as much help with his academic tasks as he needed with his finances. Now Obama had been hired at the prestigious University of Chicago law school as an adjunct and had to actually teach a class – and appear credible. So, roll in the Ayers-Dohrn machine to the rescue. Just like the way that Ayers came to the rescue and wrote “Dreams From My Father” for Barry.
Lawyer-in-all-but-name Bernardine Dohrn puts together a curriculum including lecture notes, and even writes the syllabus for Obama (as evidenced by the excellent prose, grammar and punctuation). All she needs to do is give Obama a few rhetorical platforms per class session (of which there were only FOUR) upon which he can then launch “class discussion.” Dohrn could have put this together in just a few hours. In class, Barry kicks back, fakes the role of all-wise “professor”, and cruises while the students in the class basically teach themselves.
It should be mentioned that Dohrn has been a law professor since 1991, and focuses on race and juvenile/education issues. Which is pretty much exactly the focus of Obama’s course syllabus.
Oh, and Bill Ayers has a Ed.D. in “Curriculum and Instruction.” As in, putting together curricula.
Just sayin’.
The only reason b.o. was elected in the first place, was because he had mccain running against him. I don’t understand, how the Republican Party can have so many losers running for president. The only one that I had hoped would run, was Allen West. He hasn’t, and I’m very afraid, that after this election, he won’t ever have a chance. I firmly believe that b.o. is going to destroy our country, and even if romney should win, he will be the same as b.o. Unfortunately, I believe our Constitution is in dire peril, and I so no savior on the horizon.
The reason we are seeing the republican losers is they(big brother) control both parties. obama is doing exactly what they want him to do. Have you read Orwell’s 1984. obama is a text book exactly of Newsspeak and doublethink. Here is a page that describes the orwell’s blueprint and the mechanics of obama. http://granddesignexposed.com/george/orwell.html
We have to ask ourself who controls big brother?
To fully understand obama, lets look at his Intelligence leaders: Yes he is just a puppet, but who are pulling his strings. The below is on a picture at the link below.
President Barack Obama meets with Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, right (Alma Mater St. Mary’s University, Texas), in the Oval Office, Sept. 9, 2010. Also attending are, clockwise from left, Robert Cardillo, DIA deputy Director (and now Director of National intelligence for intelligence integration and schooled at Georgetown), Deputy National Security Advisor Tom Donilon (Donillon attended la Salle Academy, earned a B.A. at: The Catholic University of America in 1977 and is connected personally to the Biden family). Rodney Snyder, Senior Director for intelligence Program, NSS(Can not find any kind of BIO on him). John Brennan, Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counter terrorism ( Attended private catholic schools from his youth, is Alma mater at Fordham University and is former CIA), and National Security Advisor Gen. James L. Jones (Alma Mater Georgetown University).
To view the picture go to: http://granddesignexposed.com/george/jesuits.html
A picture is worth a thousand words. Take a look at the picture.
You’re exactly right about Barry’s lack of mental prowess. Of course the mainstream media touts his intelligence. Even conservative talkers have agreed. Not! Speaking, he’s a stammerer. He can’t rely on intelligence and logic, so he panders, alters dialect, plays race card, divides Americans into classes, plays to mob mentality, and finds any way possible to stoke emotions rather than look at facts.
He cannot compete in open, honest, factual debate with even an average opponent.
I would just like to provide a quick response to several points you wrote.
First, your proof that he didn’t write is syllabus is that it employs good writing, subjectively compared by you to other things he wrote. I’ll go ahead and leave this one “inconclusive.” But I think it’s safe to say that sort of comparison requires more than your groundless speculation. I will say, however, that plenty of professors create their syllabi using those from previous years, written by other professors. It’s a way of perfecting the curriculum over time.
Secondly, have you ever been a part of a discussion-based seminar course? I would venture to say you haven’t seeing as your perception of the professor is merely someone who sits back and pretends to be smart. Sorry, but that’s not how it works. Discussions have a sort of elastic trajectory, such that the students can voice their opinions and thoughts, yet still learn about the necessary material by the end of the class. It takes a skilled instructor to be able to guide the class through this sort of learning. You must be well-versed in both the course material and the skill set of leading discussion.
My third and final point is to respond to your claim that Michelle and Barack Obama are “affirmative action frauds.” To begin, the whole notion of affirmative action is a myth. There are no racial quotas for college admissions; if you do not meet the minimum requirements of a school, you won’t get it. What affirmative action truly is, is giving preference to applicants who have other qualifications or characteristics as well. So yes, being an underprivileged minority will help you get into Harvard, but again, only if you also have good grades and work hard. But what characteristics do most colleges actually look for? Athletics and legacy. Far more beneficiaries of affirmative action are rich, white athletes than African Americans. Additionally, whether or not either of the Obamas got into school or their jobs on affirmative action, if they weren’t qualified for the position, they wouldn’t have succeeded. One quick look over their resumes should show that this is not the case.
Unfortunately for you, Ms. Barnhardt, groundless, unverified conjecture does not constitute factual, logical argumentation. Guess which one this post is?